Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept. Inspector General Contradicts Clinton: Emails ‘Contained Classified Information When…’
Cybercast News Service ^ | July 27, 2015 | 11:04 AM EDT | Brittany M. Hughes

Posted on 07/28/2015 12:23:23 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The inspectors general for the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Intelligence Community issued a joint written statement late Friday afternoon asserting that emails that Hillary Clinton had on her personal email account while she was Secretary of State, and that she kept on a personal server after she left the government, “contained classified information when they were generated,” “remain classified today” and “should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system.”

This joint statement the two inspectors general issued late Friday contradicts what former Secretary Clinton said about the emails on Saturday.

So far, the inspector general for the Intelligence Community has only been allowed to review a sample of 40 out of the total of 30,000 emails from Clinton’s private email server that Clinton has turned over to the State Department. Of that limited sample of 40, 4 contained classified information. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: classified; emails; hillary; hillaryemails; inspectorsgeneral; personalserver; statedeptig
Full title: State Dept. Inspector General Contradicts Clinton: Emails ‘Contained Classified Information When They Were Generated’
1 posted on 07/28/2015 12:23:23 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Obama Sharks are amassing, and circling the quickly sinking campaign of the Cankle Queen. She better swim for shore and retire with her millions.


2 posted on 07/28/2015 12:34:04 AM PDT by rikkir (Anyone still believe the 8/08 Atlantic cover wasn't 100% accurate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Like Buchanan said, this woman should be getting ready for trial, not campaigning for president.

Of course, what else is expected from professional politicians in 2015 America?


3 posted on 07/28/2015 12:35:18 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She used this E-mail account exclusively during her tenure as SOS. This means that you have to believe that she had absolutely no confidential or secret communications at all. Does anyone actually believe this BS?


4 posted on 07/28/2015 12:43:28 AM PDT by Cololeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I think Hillary kept the private server for several reasons.

#1 She wanted to prevent the outside world from accessing their Foundation cash cow, to continue raising funds and to take foreign money out of the eyes of the Voters and Federal government.

#2 She wanted to control her image and what she was connected to or responsible/liable for currently and regarding history.

#3 She is just a hands on control freak. She wants to own the game and the rules that are played all to favor her.


5 posted on 07/28/2015 1:00:12 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

As Secretary of State, Hillary deliberately and methodically conducted the most massive and damaging security breach in United States history. It wouldn’t surprise me if we literally have no secrets left. When she was passed over for the presidency, she decided there was going to be hell to pay, and so she ripped open the guts of her own country and gave it all out to our enemies. It’s sabotage on such a staggering scale, there aren’t any words for it.


6 posted on 07/28/2015 1:02:34 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Let’s just say that this “woman” doesn’t have an honest bone in her body.


7 posted on 07/28/2015 1:04:07 AM PDT by Cololeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cololeo

She has a known sense of entitlement and liked being famous and in front of cameras. Had a perfume line when with Trump and since becoming an ex has nothing in public view.
I think this is probably BS. Are there Cosby like numbers of women he dated and ex wives all calling him a Bill Clinto level of predictor?
If tha were the case he could have used it as a resume enhancer to run as a Democrat.


8 posted on 07/28/2015 1:10:24 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

You’re in the wrong thread.


9 posted on 07/28/2015 1:26:55 AM PDT by Cololeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cololeo

No. Never did. And apparently the two Inspectors General have confirmed she did.


10 posted on 07/28/2015 1:41:51 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hillary: “oops, my bad. What difference...”


11 posted on 07/28/2015 2:47:17 AM PDT by exnavy (Common sense seems to be uncommon these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

But look, someone has a Confederate flag decal on their truck! Let’s talk about that instead.


12 posted on 07/28/2015 3:22:20 AM PDT by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I can hear the coming excuse now... “I didn’t know.” Or “it was my staff’s responsibility to flag classified information before it was given to me.” Yada Yada. .. Tap dancing away... It does not matter, that b... is responsible for for a serious compromise. Anyone, and I mean any one else would be investigated, almost certainly prosecuted and serve time. They dont, and we will never successfully prosecute another national security case. Every defense lawyer will merely point to the precedent and claim equal protection.


13 posted on 07/28/2015 4:30:44 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hillary is basically claiming that the emails were not classified because SHE did not designate them as classified.


14 posted on 07/28/2015 4:41:32 AM PDT by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If the full truth were ever known, we would learn that Hillary committed treason by peddling her influence as SOS to foreign interests in exchange for cash donations to her family stash.

My guess is Obama will promise her a pardon if she gets “ill” and drops out of the race.


15 posted on 07/28/2015 5:19:57 AM PDT by IamConservative (There is no greater threat to our freedoms than Bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
If foreign entities could hack various government servers to include the pentagon, state dept, OPM, not to mention our national infrastructure....wouldn't it be safe to assume a private email server kept at Hillary's residence might be easy pickins for intelligence services worldwide?

Intentional or not, Hillary has created treasonous act that has placed our country at great risk. She should be held to account.

16 posted on 07/28/2015 5:55:50 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Over / under on when Michelle Obama announces she’s running?

I’m taking December 15...


17 posted on 07/28/2015 6:39:26 AM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Another unvettable candidate by the media? Why not; they’ve already broken trust with the public by refusing to vet the incumbent.


18 posted on 07/28/2015 6:45:04 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Why are else would they be trashing Hillary.

Maybe they are just distancing themselves from her because they know more than is yet public.

But it feels like they are blocking for someone, and it darn sure isn’t Biden. That begs the obvious question: Who are they clearing the road for?


19 posted on 07/28/2015 6:52:33 AM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

I think they fear that the Republicans are simply biding their time with Hillary, in terms of taking her down at the moment of their choosing. That is, when it would too late for the Democrats to proffer a strong alternative in her place. Therefore, if Hillary is going to go down anyway, they (the MSM) want to see it happen sooner rather than later. That way they’d have time to prop someone else up (such as Elizabeth Warren) and basically carry that someone across the finish line like they have done twice now with Obama.


20 posted on 07/28/2015 8:21:03 AM PDT by EireCane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson