Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
A friend of mine, a Civil War buff, speculated that units of archers could have played a role on the 1860’s battlefield. He said trained archers could put out a higher rate—6 to 8 arrows per minute—of fire than infantry armed with Springfield or Enfield rifled muskets—2 to 3 rounds per minute. Of course the riflemen would have a great advantage in range over the bowmen who might well be limited to fighting from defensive positions, firing indirectly in volleys at masses of attackers. Just saying.
41 posted on 07/30/2015 12:08:32 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Brad from Tennessee

Nothing came close to the Mongol rate of sustained fire and accuracy for 600 centuries.


49 posted on 07/30/2015 12:21:19 PM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

***units of archers could have played a role on the 1860’s battlefield.***

Ben Franklin came to the same conclusion in the Revolutionary War.


74 posted on 07/30/2015 3:10:30 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson