Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear And Biochemical Experts At Tianjin Site
Sky News ^ | 8/13/15 | unknown

Posted on 08/13/2015 6:59:54 PM PDT by proust

More than 200 nuclear and biochemical experts from the Chinese military have been sent to the port city of Tianjin after two huge explosions killed at least 50 people.

A team from the International Atomic Energy Agency's Beijing environmental emergency response centre has also gone to the area.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.sky.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; cyanide; diisocyanate; explosion; exsplosion; iaea; sodium; tianjin; toluene
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
Yooge and series!
1 posted on 08/13/2015 6:59:55 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: proust

Also bear in mind it’s Sky News (Murdock).


2 posted on 08/13/2015 7:00:53 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Tiniest Tianjin Nuke Ever!


3 posted on 08/13/2015 7:05:26 PM PDT by mylife (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMR-PX4OHK0"The roar of the masses could be farts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Well, if you want some more speculation on this, it can be found on Jim Sinclair’s website:


Did The FINAL WAR Just Start?

Posted August 13th, 2015 at 5:10 PM (CST) by Jim Sinclair & filed under Bill Holter.

Dear CIGAs,

The question of our title is very important, “Did the FINAL WAR just start?”. If you polled Americans on this question, 99.9% would answer “no” if you took out the Middle East. Last week I wrote “The Rumblings of War” regarding the IMF rebuffing China’s entry into the SDR. This was followed up by “The shot heard ’round the world” on Tuesday commenting on China’s surprise devaluation. The purpose of this writing is to show you YES, we are in fact at war! Rather than “tell” you we are at war, I feel it is better to point out a few dots, connect some of them and then ask a few questions which might help you understand the war that is in fact being waged. If you can answer some of the questions then connecting dots and forming your own conclusions will be easier.

As our backdrop, we are “told” the world is in recovery from the very bad experience of 2008. Since then, various central banks have monetized debt on a massive scale, led by the Federal Reserve of the U.S.. Undoubtedly, the greatest “export” from the U.S. has been dollars themselves and financial products known as derivatives. For the most part, the world spun merrily until last fall when Saudi Arabia decided to increase production and lower prices. This was presumably done at the request of the U.S. and meant as a tool to injure Russia’s energy sector, economy and financial system. Can the petrodollar which became accustomed to $100 oil be supported with sub $50 oil? There are two sides to this coin, yes the consumer of oil saves but doesn’t lower oil price mean less liquidity in the system? Doesn’t it mean lower velocity and less demand for dollars?

Moving along, did anyone really wonder “why” or what (or better yet, WHO) was behind China being put off for acceptance as a component of the SDR? Then just two trading days later, China devalued their currency in a surprise move…followed by two more devaluations! Remember, the U.S. has been prodding China to strengthen their currency and has gone so far as to call them a “currency manipulator”! Now we see China doing the exact opposite of U.S. requests (demands?). World markets have been shaken, and at a time when liquidity is quite tight.


Continued at:

http://www.jsmineset.com/2015/08/13/did-the-final-war-just-start/


4 posted on 08/13/2015 7:06:10 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

5 posted on 08/13/2015 7:06:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Saw the video, looks like an initial massive fire, followed by two giant explosions.


6 posted on 08/13/2015 7:07:26 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

There’s a lot of “missing” Russian suitcase nukes. I have no idea what force they have.


7 posted on 08/13/2015 7:08:09 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Interesting.


8 posted on 08/13/2015 7:08:41 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Yikes!......Lower oil prices lower the GDP!


9 posted on 08/13/2015 7:08:53 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proust

The BBC’s headline for a similar stort...did not include the word Nuclear.....oddly enough.


10 posted on 08/13/2015 7:09:24 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Oil Wei Tu Lo


11 posted on 08/13/2015 7:09:58 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Wost of the world is busy posting kitteh pictures to each other on their Iphones while weaving down the road.


12 posted on 08/13/2015 7:12:31 PM PDT by mylife (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMR-PX4OHK0"The roar of the masses could be farts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proust

Fires don’t set off nukes.

Still, IAEA may just be using the “Crisis” to get a look around.


13 posted on 08/13/2015 7:14:52 PM PDT by mylife (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMR-PX4OHK0"The roar of the masses could be farts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

Out of those two, I don’t know who to trust.


14 posted on 08/13/2015 7:15:01 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

It does not seem to have been nuclear. No one viewing the flash suffered retina searing, no apparent zones have been established for evacuation, no citizens gave been advised to shelter in place to avoid fallout.

The presence of CBR teams may be related to chemical contamination a though nice the University at least had a nuclear research lab and there are hospitals nearby, radioactive materials in shipment that blew with everything else could have made the explosion a “ dirty” blast

There are plenty of recovery people and military in the zone with masks but not full gear

Watching the cleanup and civilian treatment the next few days may give clues about what is under tight censorship now


15 posted on 08/13/2015 7:16:16 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proust
I really doubt it was low-yield suitcase nuke. For two reasons: 1) even a 0.02 kT nuclear explosion would result in a pulse of electromagnetic radiation that would immediately wipe out every cellphone or electronic device within 1 km of the explosion or disable it, and 2) the initial heat pulse from the explosion would have vaporized many of the containers within 200-300 meters of the explosion point.
16 posted on 08/13/2015 7:17:20 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

You know your stuff, thanks!


17 posted on 08/13/2015 7:17:27 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

I completely forgot about the emp effect. Thanks.


18 posted on 08/13/2015 7:18:30 PM PDT by proust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Watching the cleanup and civilian treatment the next few days may give clues about what is under tight censorship now

Agreed.

19 posted on 08/13/2015 7:18:50 PM PDT by mylife (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMR-PX4OHK0"The roar of the masses could be farts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: proust
Thanks for the warning.
So ask yourself what is Murdoch's spin on this !
20 posted on 08/13/2015 7:20:22 PM PDT by ncalburt ( Amnesty-media out in full force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson