Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A new program aims to help poor and minority families qualify for mortgages.[Fannie]
Atlantic, the ^ | 28 August 2015 | Gillian B. White

Posted on 08/28/2015 11:48:10 AM PDT by Lorianne

In the years since the recession, the dream of a steady paycheck and a home in a nice neighborhood have become more elusive for many working-class Americans. While some may say that the lack of homeownership reflects changing values, owning a home remains an important tool for wealth building for most families. Yet it is particularly unattainable for low-income and minority households. The homeownership rate for households that fall below median income was less than 50 percent in 2014, for those who made above the median it was nearly 80 percent. And the gap in homeownership between whites, and blacks and Hispanics is almost as large.

Now, a new program from Fannie Mae is trying to change that.

This week, the government-sponsored enterprise unveiled plans for a new loan product. HomeReady is specifically targeted toward low-income and minority households, and it allows prospective buyers to pay just a 3 percent down payment up front, provides a homeowner’s education course, and the biggest boon—the program will allow applicants to count income from those who won’t actually be borrowers, toward their gross income. That means in multi-generational households, the contributions of children or grandparents—and for younger borrowers, financial assistance from parents, or aunts and uncles—could be included. For current owners who rent a room or portion of their home for extra income, the money they receive from tenants would count as income if they decide to move.

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: financialmeltdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: umgud
Maybe after the crash, I could buy my house back at a steep discount.
I retired in late 2007 and started looking to buy a condo in Florida as a winter retreat.
Being a procrastinator, I never did pull the trigger, and within a few years I noticed the $150K condos I had been looking at were well under $100K.
21 posted on 08/28/2015 12:09:46 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Sometimes procrastination is good.


22 posted on 08/28/2015 12:18:20 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
the biggest boon—the program will allow applicants to count income from those who won’t actually be borrowers, toward their gross income

If all these extra people aren't on the hook for repaying the loan, what the hell is the point of adding them in the first place?

Just make up people (which will in all likelihood happen) or add people without their knowledge or consent (which will also probably happen). Add Donald Trump's name to your loan application.

23 posted on 08/28/2015 12:19:38 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

This is specifically structured to be the illegal immigrant’s best friend. Living in a single family dwelling that is now home to between two and five families, is the norm.

Property values? They don’t need no stinkin’ property values.


24 posted on 08/28/2015 12:22:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Will you really want to buy your house back after 40 illegals have trashed it while using it as a safe house, as they do in Houston and San Antonio?


25 posted on 08/28/2015 12:48:24 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; Old Sarge; Gefn; EnigmaticAnomaly; Califreak; kalee; TWhiteBear; freeangel; ...

26 posted on 08/28/2015 12:57:43 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
from those who won’t actually be borrower

that's part of what this about, allowing to add up the income, illegal income, from the 2 dozen illegals crammed into one house.

27 posted on 08/28/2015 1:04:02 PM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: joethedrummer
So.. if you’re poor and WHITE, you get..

and that's the other reason for this POS. Many folks, my Wife and I (not white btw) included, managed to turn a nice profit during the loose lending. People got burned but the majority of those that got burned good were the people that could not afford the mortgage, treated their home like an ATM, lack the basic skills in life, like paying a bill on time.

guess who?

28 posted on 08/28/2015 1:10:56 PM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

You’re probably right, but hopefully 40 illegals can’t afford my place.


29 posted on 08/28/2015 1:14:36 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
From the article:
While the program will surely face additional opposition the fact remains that income is only one of several requirements used to assess a borrower’s loan-worthiness.

Written with the heart of a socialist or, at the least, a do-gooder who chooses to ignore cause and effect.

One of the other "several requirements" is a government mandate that the taxpayers reach in their pockets and help pay for what the record shows will likely be a failure. One wonders if political opposition will step up to this challenge.

30 posted on 08/28/2015 1:16:53 PM PDT by frog in a pot (What if a previously D liberal candidate promised all the things we wanted to hear from the R's?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The homeownership rate for households that fall below median income was less than 50 percent in 2014...here we go again - the collapse of the economy in 2008 was the result of the government's coercing Fannie and Freddie to purchase at least 50% of their mortgages for households below the median income level, and Fannie and Freddie coercing the servicing banks to write such mortgages for people who couldn't afford them - 'rats never learn anything, and the people who keep electing them don't seem to either.....
31 posted on 08/28/2015 1:25:06 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Whordiots.


32 posted on 08/28/2015 1:40:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Let’s see now, middle aged white man with a job of over 25 yrs. (Income). Married w/working spouse (Income). Surviving mother-in-law(Income). Own rental property (Income). Have 1 brother and 2 sisters (Income). Nieces & nephews galore (Income). Two friends, both work and one is black (Income). Gimme dat McMansion Dawg ! ! ! !

Snoot ;o)


33 posted on 08/28/2015 1:40:42 PM PDT by snooter55 (People may doubt what you say, but they will always believe what you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Deja vu


34 posted on 08/28/2015 1:54:55 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Haven’t these liberal morons had enough fun ruining the American economy with their homeownership for the poor programs that crashed a few years ago?

Great Utopian ideal but impossible to attain in the real world where folks have to be able to pay the mortgage.


35 posted on 08/28/2015 4:06:44 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a murderer, and find one.... what's yoIur plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Why are we permitting people known for not being committed to anything, to enter into a long-term commitment?
Worth repeating. Well said.


36 posted on 08/28/2015 4:09:27 PM PDT by Recompennation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Recompennation

Universal Homeownership is a great Utopian ideal. But selling homes to folks who don’t always have the income to support a mortgage payment is insane. What happens if the renter moves out or the relative who’s helping with the mortgage payment dies or goes to jail?

It’s bad enough to base lending decisions on marginal income folks, but pooling several marginal incomes together in the hope they will stay together for the 30 year term of the mortgage is totally loony. Isn’t anyone in power smart enough to think this through?

Haven’t we learned that lesson from the last crash or will be liberal ideologues put the country through another financial debacle?


37 posted on 08/28/2015 4:25:32 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a murderer, and find one.... what's yoIur plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

The government’s lack of sanity. You know I get sooo tired of seeing newer cars nicer clothes and better groceries every where except in my possession but I guess I just don’t get it ... Get it. Oh annd shiny wheels boats trucks motorcycles and places to stay at too... what’s not to like ¿


38 posted on 08/28/2015 4:57:51 PM PDT by Recompennation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson