Posted on 09/03/2015 4:52:22 AM PDT by Nextrush
There is an exception to rendering unto Caesar: when Caesar’s commands conflict with God’s. This is pointed out in Acts 5: 26-29. The examples of Shadrach, Meshach, Abed-Nego and Daniel in the book of Daniel are worthy of following, too.
Too many conservatives are calling for this lady to submit to the power of the judiciary. They are ignoring that no law has been replaced, so there is nothing for this woman to operate on.
The judge does not get to write the new law.
And just because a judge says your law cannot forbid homosexual marriage does not mean that a clerk can simply start issuing homosexual marriage licenses.
The legislature could have something entirely different in mind. That old law was written to a particular culture. In a new culture they might want to have an entirely different system.
yep. nobody is asking her to personally recognize it....only administering the state’s decision to recognize it...
Well, if we tied voting to those NOT on welfare, Dumbo surely would NEVER have been elected....an idea where I see NO conflict Constitutionally.
Why should one be able to vote MORE $$ of another into their own pockets when they are are already on the dole?
Same goes for unions and all else of crony Capitalism/Fascism....No donations, no lobbying, no volunteering of time/etc. when one is paid/given $$ by the taxpayers
She’s currently FOLLOWING the ‘rules’ (Law). She has no obligation to enforce a judicial decree by black robed tyrants.
Her rallying cry should be, “Show me the statute...”
What "law"? SCOTUS invalidated KY law. They did NOT replace it.
Only the KY legislature can do that.
Amen!
Jim Bunning needs to discipline his errant son sitting as a black-robed tyrant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.