Posted on 09/07/2015 5:36:04 PM PDT by markomalley
Edited on 09/07/2015 6:35:40 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
No matter how the media frames this – it is what it is, an Islamic invasion of Europe.
Is there a modern day Charles Martel in Europe? Me thinks not.
This is a cautionary tale for America. We must now allow these invaders into our country. This is a hijrah, a migration to Islamize a new land.
(video at link)
Muslim refugees chant ‘**** You’ and ‘ Allahu Akbar’ in Budapest
Thanks to RS:
f you look at the mainstream media coverage of the event, it’s all happy families and grateful women and old men.
Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orban, was criticized online and in person on Thursday for writing in a German newspaper that it was important to secure his nation’s borders from mainly Muslim migrants “to keep Europe Christian.”
“Those arriving have been raised in another religion, and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but Muslims,” Mr. Orban wrote in a commentary for Frankfurt Allgemeine Zeitung, a German newspaper. “This is an important question, because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity.”
“Is it not worrying in itself that European Christianity is now barely able to keep Europe Christian?” Mr. Orban asked. “There is no alternative, and we have no option but to defend our borders.”
Before meeting with Mr. Orban on Thursday in Brussels, Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council, which represents European Union leaders, thanked him for securing Europe’s borders, but took issue with the argument of Mr. Orban’s opinion article.
It’s rather shocking that things have gotten so bad that a faithless, multicultural Europe is chiding Hungary for sounding the alarm about maintaining their Christian identity.
On the other hand, many Muslims are actually converting to Christianity, but only for the sake of increasing their chances to be accepted as refugees:
Muslim migrants are converting to Christianity in their droves in the hope it will greatly improve their chances of winning asylum in Germany.
Hundreds of mostly Iranian and Afghan asylum seekers have changed faiths at the evangelical Trinity Church in a leafy Berlin neighbourhood alone.
Many claim true belief prompted the move, but the decision undoubtedly boosts their chances of being granted asylum by allowing them to claim they would face persecution if sent home.
Germany expected about 2,500 refugees to arrive in the country by early afternoon today after some 20,000 came in over the weekend.
Chancellor Angela Merkel today described the influx as ‘breathtaking’ and said it would change the make-up of country forever.
She said: ‘What we are experiencing now is something that will occupy and change our country in coming years.’
She said Germany will ensure that those who need protection receive it, but that those who stand no chance of getting asylum will have to return to their homes swiftly.
We of course, welcome any sincere convert to the Kingdom of God, but only if they’re sincere.
Meanwhile, Turkey is angrily denouncing Europe’s reticence to accept refugees:
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmed Davutoglu on Sunday criticised the “ridiculously small” share of refugees the EU is accepting, labelling the continent the “Christian fortress Europe.”
Turkey had taken more than two million people alone from war-torn Syria and Iraq, creating “a buffer zone between the chaos and Europe,” Davutoglu wrote for Monday’s edition of Germany’s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.
He criticised as low the financial contribution the EU had made in support of Turkey’s effort, according to excerpts pre-released in German by the conservative newspaper Sunday.
There seemed to be the “convenient reflex” to load the refugee problems on the shoulders of Turkey and to build a “Christian fortress Europe,” he wrote.
How is that an epithet?!
And why isn’t he criticizing the other of the 57 Muslim states who won’t accept the refugees? Why does Europe have to take them?
Euro-Jews are toast. Change you can believe in.
ping
WHY DID OIL-RICH ARAB COUNTRIES ABANDON MUSLIM REFUGEES?
Frontpage Mag ^ | 09/05/2015 | Nonie DarwishWestern media is reporting on the Muslim refugee crisis as a humanitarian problem that the West must deal with. But where are the media’s questions about the huge financial and land resources available to oil rich Arab and Muslim countries? Where are the Islamic solutions in this equation?The world is often lectured to about the urgency of respecting Arab and Islamic brotherly love, but where is the Arab action to rescue fellow Muslims and Arabs from the claws of ISIS?
Where are Arab feminists, especially those who demonstrated against France for banning the hijab? They are silent and doing nothing to rescue thousands of women that are victims of Islamic jihadist rape and enslavement. The only compassionate women helping women in the Middle East are the Christian mother Teresas and Kayla Muellers of the western world.
Where are the mighty Arab armies who waged dozens of wars against Israel? Why aren’t they fighting ISIS and building tent cities in the vast deserts of Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the wealthy Gulf States? They are all claiming they are “moderate” Muslims and that they are against ISIS. But is one substantive thing they have done?..............
The Islamic demographic conquest of EuroArabia... next U.S. with Obama’s help.
The beginning of the end of Western Civilization and freedom in the world.
The massive invasion of Europe by Muslims disguised as refugees.
There is a rush of Muslims refuge in Europe converting to Christianity. Those are the most dangerous. According to Islamic faith an apostate Muslim is it so facto condemned to death, unless is a fake conversion (taqqiya) to further the expansion of Islam.
“Those who Ignore History are damned to repeat it” George Santayana
History of the Jihad against Byzantine Christians of Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey (634-1453)
This site brings you the history of the Islamic Jihad from its beginnings at Mecca in 620 C.E. up to 9/11, and the lessons it has for us in today’s challenging times. If we are to understand Islam, we need to understand the temperament of its founder Mohammed (PBUH*), the way victorious Muslims have treated the subject people, and above all the reasons for the victory of Islam.
This site is dedicated to frank and fearless reporting and commenting on the Islamic Jihad.
Monday, September 7, 2015
How the Jihad ravaged Christian Byzantium for 800 years, and how valiantly the Byzantine Christians held back the Arab and Turkish hordes, saving Europe from Islam
While the Zoroastrian Persians were defeated and were being subjugated, the Muslim hordes turned on their other neighbor the Christian Byzantines. The two armies met at the battlefield of Heiromyak.
Lessons from the Battle of Heiromyak (Al Yarmuk)
At the Battle of the Yarmuk (river), between the Muslim Arabs and the Byzantines, the Muslim Arabs were losing the battle in the initial stages. When the victory seemed certain for the Byzantines, the Muslims took recourse to subterfuge, when they realized that victory could not come to them through straight warfare, they used a contingent of women to attack the Byzantine troops who charged at the Byzantine army shrieking and hollering. This contingent was led by Hind Bint Utbah, the wife of Abu Sufyan, who was the chieftain of Mecca. Not used to facing ladies as an adversary, the Byzantines were at a loss to respond and the confused Byzantine generals ordered their troops not to molest the women and to withdraw.
The Muslims have used subterfuge and ruthless cruelty to win wars against all adversaries. At the battle of Yarmuk (Heiromyak) when the warriors of the Holy Cross began prevailing over those of the Crescent, the Muslims resorted to subterfuge.
When the Arab Muslims saw that this tactic using women as a deceptive front was working, they sent in the main contingent of Arab men dressed as women in hijabs (the black tent like gown worn by Muslim women) to charge at the Byzantines, and in the process one of the Arab generals Khalid-ibn-Walid disguised as a woman in a hijab, embraced the Byzantine General Harbees and crushed his ribs, thus killing him. With their general dead, the Byzantine army became leaderless, and the fortunes of the battle started going in favor of the Muslim Arabs. This is how the tricky and insidious Muslims won the battle of Yarmuk. Another example of Allah intervening to give the Muslims victory in war (sic)!
Unfortunately for humankind, the end of the death-seeking fiery cult of Islam can only come about through a fiery death-giving weapon. Ironically such nuclear mushroom clouds would be the blazing hell-fire that the Quran talks about and acknowledges will bring about an end to Islam such that there will be no one across the globe to say “Lah ilah il Allah, Mohammed ur Rasoolallah” (There is no god but allah and Mohammed is his prophet).
The rest of the history
http://www.historyofjihad.org/byzantine.html
Merkel must really hate Jews to those refugees to settle in Germany. No doubt many of them are members of ISIS infiltrating other countries, and many others are their supporters.
Are the British ready to see Westminster Abby razed and replaced with a mosque? There is no inclination by the Muslims to live among their religious enemies. That includes the atheists who usually cheer islamic murderers on because they hate Christians so much.
It reminds me of when the Gruesomes moved next door to the Flintstones.
Trojan Horse 2.0
Merkel is absolutely insane. Germany will either die a silent death or all hell will break loose. Obama has done more to ruin the world than any other despot or tyrant could ever dream of including Bin Laden, Hitler or any A-hole from the former USSR.
At some point the war starts.
Bump
How sweet.
(utter and complete /s)
The war started a generation ago. It’s an entirely one-sided war because the Euros aren’t fighting, and I don’t think they ever will. All the real men of Europe died at Verdun, the Somme and Stalingrad. The two world wars killed Europe, and they never recovered. They will go quietly because they just don’t have the moral will to defend themselves.
Gee, .. . . thanks anyway.
It's already started. Historians in the future (if there is a future) will argue about what was the opening volley. I would submit that it's the toppling of Saddam Hussein.
Where’s Vlad the Impaler when you need him?
Allahu FUBAR!
I believe that the proper solution to this situation is to grant refugee status to any woman, child under the age of sixteen, and elders over the age of sixty.
All men between 16 and 60 should be compelled to do the patriotic deed of returning to their homeland, reclaiming it from the islamists, and securing it for the safe repatriation by their families.
It may seem unfairly brutal, but afterall, war IS hell. And those able-bodied men have an obligation to their own country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
