Posted on 09/08/2015 10:25:56 AM PDT by Biggirl
Congressman Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) argued that while you need a wall in some places, You cant build a wall from sea to shining sea. It just doesnt work. Its the most expensive way to do border security, and its the least effective on Tuesdays broadcast of MSNBCs Morning Joe.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
"GOP REP HURD: BORDER WALL "MOST EXPENSIVE" AND "LEAST EFFECTIVE" WAY TO DO BORDER SECURITY"
So, instead we do nothing?
Did he endorse Jeb or Rubio or maybe Kasich?
The wall has been very effective in Israel
Now sit the hell down and stay out of the way while this problem gets fixed.
So what’s Hurd’s solution?
People just astound me sometime of how stupid they are...
Trump 2016!!! All the way to the White House!!!
With or without a wall, I suggest we put the worst of the illegal employers in handcuffs.
Do nothing and keep voting for him.
He’s probably one of these quisling virtual high tech proponents for and electronic fence that doesn’t offend anyone.
That was tried already. Boeing got a super huge contract for the electronic miracle and effed it up. Shakey towers, radars that couldn’t detect dismounts and the whole nine yards. Just one big boondoggle.
Which actually means the exact opposite..................
If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?
You are going to do what we say whether you like it or not, or you will be gone.
At least that’s what the Chamber of Amnesty told him.
Growing backlash against the illegals is growing.
I bet he lives in a ‘Gated Community’.......................
Well, not really. The current policy of totally ignoring the masses flooding across our boarder is the least effective. I still like the idea of towers every two miles (less expensive) with a Marine sniper in each with orders to "Shoot to wound". They are then tattooed with a big "I" on their forehead and returned home. If a Marine sees a target with an "I" on their forehead, the Rules of Engagement instantly change.
If you catch and deport them most of the rest of them will leave.
I believe (and I hope) that his point is that a full wall at all points is not necessary. The geography, geology, and topology can make it expensive and ineffective in some places... most likely where it either isn’t necessary, or it can (and should) be protected in other ways (that would be more efficient and less expensive in those locations). The story reads to me like a headline writer is looking to drum up some emotional responses... and from the replies here so far, it’s looking like he succeeded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.