[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Sad thing is, you do not HAVE to be religious to understand that homosexuality is unnatural and not equal to heterosexuality.

[Paladin2]

Try to stay in the closet to avoid deserved ridicule.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Back when “it” was criticized so harshly in Romans 1, the audience KNEW it was something terribly wrong. The audience also KNEW that marriage of man to woman was something special. Paul was not so much providing new information as he was providing an illustration that his audience would understand, while giving it a theological point of view.

One grand sexual revolution later, and people have started saying that any norm at all is deathly stifling. I posit that “it” unfolded so rapidly because the groundwork had long been laid for “it” in said revolution.

What used to be normal is now going to need to be rediscovered almost from the ground up. That there is a way to keep sex from being heartache city and needing to be covered up with lies.

[papertyger]

Sad thing is, you do not HAVE to be religious to understand that homosexuality is unnatural and not equal to heterosexuality.

Because the difference between biological and behavioral is SOOOOOO complicated.