Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: publius911

I didn’t say that anything was less than factual. What I said was the video referenced in the article was posted in the forum earlier this morning and the admin moderator closed the post because the video had previously attracted the truther crowd which ruined the discussion. I have no issues with either Sharyl or the info gathered in her video or this presentation. I’ve been suspicious of the House of Saud since that family was allowed to exit the US during the flight ban after 9/11. While I haven’t read Unger’s book, I’m familiar with the long history of the Bush/Saud entanglement from other sources.


29 posted on 09/11/2015 10:47:05 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: T-Bird45

There are Congressional sources that have publicly stated the classified info is about Saudi involvement.

The bigger story is that inside the beltway both major parties watch each others backs—and have no interest in sharing their secrets with the public.


35 posted on 09/11/2015 2:23:29 PM PDT by cgbg (Epistemology is not a spectator sport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson