To: AngelesCrestHighway
Our next vice president Ted Cruz was on Neil Cavuto's show today and had the answer as per our constitution:
Cruz said religious convictions should have no bearing on ones fitness for the Oval Office. You know, the Constitution specifies there shall be no religious test for public office and I am constitutionalist,
17 posted on
09/21/2015 1:59:24 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Either the ruling class gets new people or we the people get a new ruling class. Trump/Cruz 2016)
To: Grampa Dave
I have always liked Ted. But his appearance on Cavuto today was disturbing.
23 posted on
09/21/2015 2:05:35 PM PDT by
dforest
To: Grampa Dave
“I am constitutionalist,
His Constitutionalism must have deserted him when he voted for the Corker monstrosity.
25 posted on
09/21/2015 2:09:31 PM PDT by
odawg
To: Grampa Dave
Cruz said religious convictions should have no bearing on ones fitness for the Oval Office. You know, the Constitution specifies there shall be no religious test for public office and I am constitutionalist,I know that Sen. Cruz had already said the part that you bolded but did he now say the first part that you left unbolded? If so I don't agree with that at all.
31 posted on
09/21/2015 2:16:02 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: Grampa Dave
Cruz said religious convictions should have no bearing on ones fitness for the Oval Office. You know, the Constitution specifies there shall be no religious test for public office and I am constitutionalist,
The President, all Federal office-holders, the military, and all Federal officers (customs, INS, and all federal-level civil "servants") take an oath to defend the constitution. There are two reasons, BASED ON THE MOSLEM KORAN, that Moslems cannot serve in these.
1) ...swear an oath... Moslems are not compelled to tell the truth. Taquia is the purposeful lying for the purpose of promoting the supremacy of Islam. A Moslem's oath is a nullity.
2) ...defend the constitution... Specifically the equal protection clause (so revered by the liberals). Just like Supreme Court Justice Taney in Dred Scott ruling (black men have no rights that white men must acknowledge), the Koran states that non-Muslims have no rights that Muslims must acknowledge AND women have no rights that Muslim men must acknowledge.
Any presidential candidate that does not acknowledge this impediment to a Muslim as president is not reality-based. I will not vote for a fool!
47 posted on
09/21/2015 3:11:34 PM PDT by
mason-dixon
(As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
To: Grampa Dave
Cruz said religious convictions should have no bearing on ones fitness for the Oval Office.I'm sorry, Grampa Dave, but I just listened to the entire Cavuto segment with Sen. Cruz and he never said that or anything like it.
Ted Cruz on Your World with Neil Cavuto (9/21/2015)
48 posted on
09/21/2015 6:26:26 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson