Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lewislynn

Doesn’t take an expert actually.

The base figure for the population includes all intentionally retired people, a massive population. The labor participation rate is never more than 70% or so. By design. Now it’s abysmal now - and it means the real unemployment figure is something like 12-15% - but not 42.


63 posted on 09/29/2015 3:50:55 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
...the real unemployment figure is something like 12-15% - but not 42...

Sounds like CNN is sort of quoting Trump remembering something about payrolls as a percentage of the total civilian non-institutional population--

--which shows a % about where Trump's quoted by the always truthful CNN.  In other words, things are as bad now as they were when Reagan was president.  imho the number says more about today's economy than the headline unemployment, but we'll need to lose the "real-unemployment" name and perhaps call it the "not-employment rate".

66 posted on 09/29/2015 4:27:09 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson