Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jsanders2001

She pulled this same crap when the voters wanted a say against the red light cameras.

She fought the proposition even getting on the ballot.
She renegotiated the contract renewal in favor of the private company to try to make it harder for the city to break its contract.


11 posted on 10/08/2015 5:28:16 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Will Bernie Sanders run as an Independent if he does not get the nomination of the Democrat Party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

Red light cams = taxpayer scam; taxpayer funds used to pay for your own misery in the name of primarily feigned safety concerns using automated moneymakers. If they could get away with it they’d have ambulances screaming through traffic forcing people to run red lights. Those companies are known for selling the cams as a big moneymaker but they take almost half the revenue themselves and penalize you bigtime if therearen’t enough red ligh runners. I’ve heard its a general practice for them to donate to the decisonmaker’s purses and give nice inducements as well.


13 posted on 10/08/2015 5:40:55 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson