Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama says Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server
washington times ^ | 10/12/15 | Dave Boyer

Posted on 10/12/2015 2:43:53 PM PDT by Nachum

On the eve of the first Democratic presidential debate, President Obama is downplaying Hillary Rodham Clinton’s use of a private email server to conduct government business, saying she made a “mistake” but didn’t endanger national security.

“I think she’d be the first to acknowledge that maybe she could have handled the original decision better and the disclosures more quickly,” Mr. Obama said in an interview on CBS’ “60 Minutes” broadcast Sunday night. “I don’t think it posed a national security problem. It was a mistake that she has acknowledged.”

When interviewer Steve Kroft pointed out that the administration has prosecuted people for having classified material on their private computers, the president said he didn’t think there was an intent to “hide something or to squirrel away information” on Mrs. Clinton’s server when she was secretary of state. He said criticism of Mrs. Clinton’s actions is being “ginned up” because of the 2016 presidential campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: Delaware; US: New York; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 60minutes; arkansas; benghazi; blackberry; canada; cbs; clinton; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; delaware; denial; election2016; email; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; humaabedin; iran; joebiden; libya; newyork; pages; peterschweizer; private; russia; security; seebs; soshillary; southcarolina; stevekroft; treygowdy; uranium; waronterror; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Of course not, and I don't know anything about that private server I got emails from.
1 posted on 10/12/2015 2:43:53 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 10/12/2015 2:44:15 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Where’s Joe Wilson’s “YOU LIE!” GIF when you need it?


3 posted on 10/12/2015 2:46:47 PM PDT by PrairieDawg (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And he knows this how?


4 posted on 10/12/2015 2:47:15 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I'm sure he knows nothing about any of these emails. Yet, somehow, he has concluded that national security was never compromised.

Interesting.

5 posted on 10/12/2015 2:48:13 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I've switched. Trump is my #1. He understands how to get things done. Cruz can be VP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is why Hillary has not looked worried.
She knows the fix is in with President Evil.


6 posted on 10/12/2015 2:48:41 PM PDT by Calpublican (Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hey Obama, a citizen of Rumania hacked all of Hillary’s emails—how is that NOT a national security risk?

Just another Goebbels level lie—repeat it often enough, and the LIVs roll over and go back to sleep.

These are not the droids you are looking for....


7 posted on 10/12/2015 2:48:42 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

How many emails did you send to Hillary?
How many emails did she send to you, 0buttboy?


8 posted on 10/12/2015 2:51:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Obama's actually disappointed she didn't damage our national security enough with her private email server.
9 posted on 10/12/2015 2:53:52 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
I don't think it posed a national security problem. It was a mistake that she has acknowledged.
So, the fact that she committed a federal offense, did Steve-O and his fellow shills mention that in a cutaway? Didn't think so.


10 posted on 10/12/2015 2:54:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Obama says Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server

Irrelevant. Keeping one classified document on an uncleared server is illegal. That server could be in a locked room, unattached to any network, with armed guards, and she would still be in violation of federal law.

11 posted on 10/12/2015 2:55:06 PM PDT by thesharkboy (posting without reading the article since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So, if Hillary prints out a top secret document and accidentally leaves it at a bar after knocking off a few borbons, if the bartender tosses it into the garbage without reading it, did she harm national security? Maybe not, but that is not the criterion. The question is whether her actions could have POTENTIALLY caused harm to the United States. The answer to that is abundantly clear.


12 posted on 10/12/2015 2:57:10 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (If Hillary's last name were anything but Clinton, she'd already be behind bars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I hope the CIA asset she outed is home safe.


13 posted on 10/12/2015 2:57:40 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well, that’s good enough for me.


14 posted on 10/12/2015 2:57:57 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Step away from the Koolade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Contrast this with the way the Republicans threw Scooter Libby under the bus.


15 posted on 10/12/2015 2:58:55 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Step away from the Koolade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“I don’t think it posed a national security problem. It was a mistake that she has acknowledged.”

Obama's duplicity is so obvious. Clinton, Bergdahl, Petraeus, Lerner, are examples of federal employees who might have been prosecuted. There are more and they all seem to fall the same way.

16 posted on 10/12/2015 2:59:31 PM PDT by oldbrowser (The kangaroos have taken over the supreme court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There goes all the conspiracy folks thinking that Obama is behind the investigations and her low polling. I knew it wasn’t the case. Dimocrats protect dimocrats no matter the person or issue.


17 posted on 10/12/2015 2:59:50 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah, we’ll get a perfectly “objective” investigation out of THIS “Justice” Department, I’m sure....


18 posted on 10/12/2015 3:02:10 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It’s against the law for Obama to interfere with a criminal investigation. What he thinks means nothing at this point though


19 posted on 10/12/2015 3:02:35 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Obama thinks we’re all stupid enough not to see his fingerprints all over the drip-drip of disclosures about Hillary’s email problem.

He may be downplaying this, but he’s also stroking Joe Biden’s considerable ego.


20 posted on 10/12/2015 3:03:32 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson