Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China hits back at US over islands
BBC News ^ | 10-14-2015 | BBC News

Posted on 10/14/2015 11:38:54 AM PDT by tcrlaf

China has hit back at the US in a row over marine territorial claims.

Foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying alluded to the US when she blamed "some countries" for flexing "their military muscles again and again" in the South China Sea.

Last week, US officials said they were considering sailing warships in an area around the Spratly island chain which China claims as territory.

It has sparked tit-for-tat warnings between the two powers.

SNIP

The row began when US officials said they were considering sending warships inside the 12-nautical-mile zones that China claims as territory around the Spratlys.

That sparked strong words from China, with Ms Hua warning: "We will never allow any country to violate China's territorial waters and airspace in the Spratly Islands, in the name of protecting freedom of navigation and overflight."

On Tuesday, US Defence Secretary Ash Carter expressed "strong concerns" over island-building, and defended Washington's plans.

"Make no mistake, the United States will fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, as we do around the world, and the South China Sea will not be an exception," he said at a news conference with the Australian foreign and defence ministers.

"We will do that in the time and places of our choosing," he added, according to Reuters news agency.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; spratleys
Pretty strong words from China. More Obama blowback...
1 posted on 10/14/2015 11:38:54 AM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
China hits back at US over islands

Scared me for a minute..when I saw the headlines and knowing what a retreater-in-chief we have, I thought it was over the Catalina Islands..

2 posted on 10/14/2015 11:42:57 AM PDT by BerniesFriend (I am BerniesFriend, however it's really Bernadette, NOT Bernie Sanders friend!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Pretty soon we will be withdrawing from Pearl Harbor.


3 posted on 10/14/2015 11:45:34 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

4 posted on 10/14/2015 11:51:00 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

If US military still has any sway, it will not permit China this territory


5 posted on 10/14/2015 11:53:25 AM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Wo Fat would make a good territorial governor.


6 posted on 10/14/2015 11:56:43 AM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

The first and only step should be going in with overwhelming naval force to clean out the islands. China does not have the ships and I think they would blink at shooting off missiles. Obama is a pussy who cannot point his ass fast enough towards any dictator and that emboldens the Chinese but they would have to pause at what they “don’t know” about American capabilities.


7 posted on 10/14/2015 12:15:01 PM PDT by WMarshal (Either the mess gets fix or the Democrat Party and the Republican Parties will implode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

China actually has a case; the US accepted in the 1920s that the islands —which nobody wanted at the time —belonged to China (which was the only nation claiming them); and defended that Chinese claim against Japan during the 1930s.

Nobody has wanted them much since, until oil deposits were found.

Now, everybody wants them.

But, as far as I’m concerned, it’s the business of the nations involved, not the US; we have enough to do in this world, without policing every border and mineral claim.


8 posted on 10/14/2015 12:30:04 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

“China does not have the ships”

they don’t need that many. They are well within the range of LOTS of land-based air.


9 posted on 10/14/2015 4:21:40 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson