Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google book-scanning project legal, says U.S. appeals court
Reuters ^ | Friday October 16, 2015 | 2:09 PM EDT | Joseph Ax

Posted on 10/16/2015 2:33:58 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: MarchonDC09122009
Authors Guild v. Google Inc, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-4829.

These Court cases always fascinate me. At the link above, there is another link to download the oral arguments. I have not yet read it.

However, I have yet to read a decision of the challenge to "copyright infringement" for works that were sold at some time in the past, may become relevant years later, and neither the copyright holder nor the publisher has any interest in reprinting the work. This results in high interest works, the few copies of which appear for sale, selling for outrageous amounts.
This benefits neither the general public, the author or the publisher.

I assume I can copy and keep a handwritten copy from an original for personal use.
I can also scan an existing copy and keep the copy for personal use.

If I am wrong, please let me know if (and where) these questions can be answered.

21 posted on 10/16/2015 4:12:27 PM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Ooops.

Authors Guild v. Google Inc, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-4829

I was unable to make a link from that.

Several sources of PDFs of the court decision are listed in the Google results.

22 posted on 10/16/2015 4:18:05 PM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
Neither is FR.

Not since the horse died.

23 posted on 10/16/2015 4:24:04 PM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: publius911

You bring up a very interesting point pertaining to out-of-print material.


24 posted on 10/16/2015 4:38:53 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

Thinking about tax free for the enterprise, not for donors like a church or charity. If the enterprise earns nothing, if it spends all its gross income, then what is the tax calculated upon?


25 posted on 10/16/2015 4:44:01 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

I’ve heard of proposals of the Library of Congress acting as middleman for “compulsory licensing” royalties for printed works (as it does now for recorded music), at least for those works where the copyright owner has not registered a wish for the work to be handled differently. It seems kind of silly to talk about the progress of arts that you can’t even get legal copies of.


26 posted on 10/16/2015 4:48:08 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

True that, I have 6-7 search engines depending on what I am up to...


27 posted on 10/16/2015 5:53:45 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
I thought Fair Use could only be applied to non-profit uses. Google is definitely not a non-profit entity.

Not, though that weighs in favor in disputed cases.

In United States copyright law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

28 posted on 10/16/2015 6:41:12 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 100American; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; kinsman redeemer; BlueDragon; metmom; boatbums; ...
True that, I have 6-7 search engines depending on what I am up to...

And you can make your own custom search, as i did .

29 posted on 10/16/2015 6:47:10 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Awesome, thanks!


30 posted on 10/16/2015 7:20:11 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Well, true. That would hold for any enterprise, although I don’t know that it wouldn’t attract the attention of the IRS if one consistently managed to never turn a profit.


31 posted on 10/17/2015 4:06:37 PM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson