Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Glad2bnuts

Frankly, the energy needed to purify and heat the tap water that the bottles are cleaned with, added to the cost of melting the bottles down, costs more than just processing new glass. If the above statement were not true, somebody would pay you for those bottles.


35 posted on 10/19/2015 7:35:22 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: lacrew

New glass contains about 30% old glass, called ‘cullet’. It is cheaper to melt glass than produce it from raw materials. The chemicals that give glass color are expensive so the old glass is valued. There has always been glass available for remelting, even before the recycling crazy began n the 60’s.

Oh, washing bottles to be recycled is a waste of water. Glass melts at 2,700 F., incinerating any organic material. Metal should be removed as it causes the silica to turn to silicon beads which weaken the bottle.

Glass furnaces run 24/7/365 from the time they are fired-up untl they are torn down years later when the fire-brick that lines them gets too thin.


43 posted on 10/19/2015 7:57:48 PM PDT by alpo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson