He’s right.
I fail to understand how ‘women’s rights’ as a concept has become so intertwined with abortion, and how it ever came to pass that a woman’s right to an abortion supersedes the rights of a developing child - especially in the context of late term and partial birth abortion.
There are consequences to having sex without contraception, and when you make the choice to do this you have become intrinsically responsible for the consequences. Except for sexual assault etc., no one makes you have sex, and no one else but yourself is ultimately responsible if you get pregnant, or get someone pregnant. This is a choice with consequences. Why is it a ‘right’ to ‘choose’ to have no responsibility for your actions?
If a man father’s a child, he is responsible for paying child support. He doesn’t legally have the right to say no. He can’t say, ‘this is going to alter my life dramatically and I have the right to choose how my life is going to be’. Nor should he. He made the upfront choices that led to him fathering a child, and he is and should be held fully responsible. Why is it different for a woman?
And nothing is said by pro abortion media regarding the targeting of women in the womb for death.
That’s real sexism.
He is right, but I also heard him say in the past 2 months that he does not see a legal way to legislate morality, but rather by changing hearts and minds...I paraphrase
So there is some inconsistency from him on this, the most important issue.
I wonder what type of Judges he would actually appoint.
When I heard him on this a few months ago it was not clear that he would go after a pro life Judge to overturn these evils.
They all need to be pressed on this most important issue