1 posted on
11/02/2015 9:58:45 AM PST by
jazusamo
To: All
2 posted on
11/02/2015 10:00:18 AM PST by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: jazusamo
Uh, it is Government Motors - partly owned by the federal government.
3 posted on
11/02/2015 10:01:58 AM PST by
Slyfox
(Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
To: jazusamo
I’ll bet the cap cost of each vehicle leased was at full retail sticker price.GM now only builds manufacturing plants OUTSIDE the USA. I would not pee on them if they were on fire.
4 posted on
11/02/2015 10:02:45 AM PST by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: jazusamo
Crony capitalism at its worst. But we predicted that this would happen.
What about the safety issues?
7 posted on
11/02/2015 10:08:38 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: jazusamo
Alternate opinion, Tahoes are frequently used by law enforcement. If border patrol I would suspect they want a body on frame platform which leaves a GM product (Tahoe, suburban or the GMC equivalent) or Expedition.
Now if they are buying the high end models and not the base models that is definatley a problem.
9 posted on
11/02/2015 10:14:45 AM PST by
matt04
To: jazusamo
Government Motors must have preference with Government buyers.
12 posted on
11/02/2015 10:21:14 AM PST by
arthurus
(Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
To: jazusamo
If the government still owns GM, then GM should be providing the vehicles to their owners at cost.
19 posted on
11/02/2015 3:52:01 PM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson