Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1
Bull!!

They took a life!!

And eye for an eye!

Death to both of them!!

Why should they live??

Why should they continue to have life? After what they did??

No....it's NOT the only moral option.

55 posted on 11/04/2015 4:16:36 PM PST by Osage Orange (The liberals are asking us to give Obama time. We agree and think 25 to life would be appropriate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Osage Orange
Death to both of them!!

I wouldn't shed a tear if they died due to their own stupidity in prison, but the death penalty is not an option for murderers under age 18. The Supremes have already spoken on that issue.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-633.pdf . . . The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed.

Until we get a real president who replaces the aging liberal judicial activists on the Court with Justices who read the Constitution, your far more appropriate choice is not an option.

57 posted on 11/04/2015 4:22:39 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson