Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Hillary Clinton’s Name Won’t Appear on Any Ballot
Freedom Outpost ^ | 11/6/2015 | Tim Brown

Posted on 11/07/2015 4:00:37 AM PST by HomerBohn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
The DOJ will do nothing! Not while Bomba and Lynch are in office.
1 posted on 11/07/2015 4:00:38 AM PST by HomerBohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
Hillary responds
2 posted on 11/07/2015 4:06:40 AM PST by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

The DO”J” and al Qaeda’s Pentagon will NEVER again
be trusted by Americans in our lifetime. NEVER.


3 posted on 11/07/2015 4:10:28 AM PST by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

TOO BIG TO JAIL!!!


4 posted on 11/07/2015 4:12:26 AM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Hillary’s big felony problem....

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information...

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.


5 posted on 11/07/2015 4:12:36 AM PST by high info voter (Liberal leftists would have "un-friended" Paul Revere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Petraeus is/was the benchmark of wrong doings. This has to be bothering Lynch. Does she understand due diligence?


6 posted on 11/07/2015 4:13:03 AM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

And don’t forget all those Republicans in Congress that voted to confirm Lynch. Nothing is going to happen to Hillary. She will be our next Obama.


7 posted on 11/07/2015 4:13:46 AM PST by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Fight it today, if possible. If not? Drag it out. Force it into the next administration.

It is years past the time when this woman should be in prison, along with her philandering spouse, and her three closest confidants.


8 posted on 11/07/2015 4:16:51 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

If they couldn’t stop Obaba with a Republican controlled DOJ they will never stop Hillary with a Democrat controlled DOJ. I’ll never trust the DOJ again, (the ACLU is more powerful).


9 posted on 11/07/2015 4:17:20 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Judge Andrew Napolitano has a remarkable level of faith in the rule of law. A far more accurate description of today’s reality is that we are facing thugs with no interest in following rules, just wielding them as weapons. Obama is a petty tyrant, and his followers are evil - motivated by power over others. If electing a lying felon furthers their cause, Hillary will be on the ballot.

Our current government has no legitimacy at all. Our only reason for obeying their demands is a well-justified fear, not because they have a right to order us to:

- pay for abortions for our employees,
- participate in gay ceremonies that mock holy matrimony,
- pretend that boys who claim to be girls (or puppies) really are girls (or puppies),
- pay fines for not purchasing the medical insurance that their cronies want to sell to us,
- pretend they have a right not to be offended by Christianity or by our patriotism (a loyalty toward the Constitutional government we used to have, not to the thugocracy of today’s tyranny),
- disarm on their orders or even limit the capacity or capabilities of our firearms,
- welcome foreign invaders who entered our country illegally, and
- pay for welfare for those foreign invaders.


10 posted on 11/07/2015 4:17:28 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

The fix was in long ago at the Department of “Just-Us”, there will be no prosecution of Herself, for any reason.

However, the THREAT of prosecution could still be used, if as it now appears, the pursuit of the candidacy for President by Herself is such a large negative, it will drag down the greater part of the liberal Democrat agenda, and as a sort of negative coat-tail effect, result in the resounding defeat of vast numbers of those aspiring to office and incumbent Democrats further down the ticket.

The Democrats would have a long and painful period of rebuilding. They may want to cut their losses now.


11 posted on 11/07/2015 4:20:49 AM PST by alloysteel (Do not argue with trolls. That means they win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Doesn’t the Judge understand that Hillary has Democratic Immunity? She could murder a classroom full of children on live TV and not face charges.


12 posted on 11/07/2015 4:21:52 AM PST by Above My Pay Grade (Donald Trump: New York City Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Deceptive headline, as the “judge” has merely been a media analyst for years—he is in no position to block any ballot listings.


13 posted on 11/07/2015 4:21:55 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

“...considering they have not so yet knowing all they know...”

Went into my 2nd mug of coffee to get thru that phrase.


14 posted on 11/07/2015 4:24:23 AM PST by Carriage Hill ( The cheddar cheese slid off my cracker on 11/6/12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I said months ago and see nothing to change my opinion: Warren/Castro 2016.

Hillary is a very bad candidate for the DNC.

Nevertheless, they are invested in their “First Presidents” meme.

First Black President, First Female President, First Hispanic President.

Female is next.

Biden stepping aside was the last hurdle for Warren.

Now, she just has to wait for the scandals around Clinton to loom large enough that the DNC breaks glass in case of emergency.


15 posted on 11/07/2015 4:26:51 AM PST by ziravan (Buck the Establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

“The DOJ will do nothing!”

Spot on.

(A quiet coup has taken place.)

IMHO


16 posted on 11/07/2015 4:30:19 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

for later


17 posted on 11/07/2015 4:30:32 AM PST by Don Hernando de Las Casas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I don’t think Napolitano is correct on this, much as he should be.


18 posted on 11/07/2015 4:31:42 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
Napolitano then concludes, "It is difficult to believe that the federal prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Clinton will not recommend that she be indicted. Inexplicably, she seems to have forgotten that they were monitoring what she said under oath to the Benghazi committee. By lying under oath, and by misleading Congress, she gave that team additional areas to investigate and on which to recommend indictments."

Hard to believe the good judge thinks this will happen under the current DOJ...

If anything happens, it will be slow walked past the 2016 election...

Even then, IF and that a big IF, she is indicted after losing, she will be fined and then write a book on her ordeal...

19 posted on 11/07/2015 4:33:31 AM PST by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I knew the law was completely dead when “the interests of justice” were served by letting Eliot Spitzer walk on multiple counts of structuring payments and violations of the Mann Act.


20 posted on 11/07/2015 4:34:34 AM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson