The Obama nightmare never ends. Now pension funds insured by Erisa will be forced to consider climate change as a primary investment criteria in lieu of maximizing investment returns.
If the link does not provide the entire article, Google the title.
Destruction of Americans is still King Obama and his communists empire and is still happening. And will happen far beyond his being kick out of the White House because these things will take time to correct if ever.
From here, it’s only a short hop to forcing all pensions to invest in bogus “socially responsible” companies. Eventually you’ll only be allowed to invest in companies that make products for brown and black people.
Superb piece by the WSJ; they should stick to pensions rather than immigration.
How about Utilities and like Dividend Generating Companies? If Utility "X" doesn't accept this Cass Sunstein "Nudge" and put in more friggen windmills or solar panels they are now the metaphorical equivalent of a Value Line 1 - 1 rating, in other words, they are screwed.
I have been saying it for the last 7 years, BHZero has been trying to de-capitalize anyone with capital. This is aimed at retiree's / investors in ole' fashioned blue chips that drive off a dividend. How dare you get a dividend, you didn't build that. This is also a regulatory stick to de-industrialize, part of the "de-growth" movement.
We Conservatives have been outplayed, and America is in Freakin' Shambles...
Same article...without the pay-wall...
http://pension360.org/forcing-green-politics-on-pension-funds/
It seems like there are billions of other topics more important than the sad streetwalker of junk science to be talked about.
Of all the debunked, foolish, Socialist, illogical, destructive, evil, hoaxes, Climate Change “science” takes the cake.
Remember, any time you see Bill Nye the Anti-Science Guy's lips moving, he's lying.
Global Warming PING!
Years ago it was stylish for Blue State public employee pension funds and labor union funds to hold big chunks of Times Company (NYT) stock. Then in 2004 it began to slowly slide—going from $49 to as low as $5 in 2011 then leveling off to $14 where it is today. These funds should be managed by private firms motivated by a desire to grow their clients’ holdings rather than some partisan agenda.