Skip to comments.New Breastfeeding Studies: Mainstream Media Still Ignores the Obvious
Posted on 11/25/2015 6:37:35 AM PST by DWW1990
About two weeks ago I linked to a piece from the Christian Post entitled "Women at Risk: Abortion and Breast Cancer [ABC] Linked." It reports, "Of the approximate 74 research studies conducted on the ABC link since 1973, 58 show a direct connection between increased breast cancer rates and induced abortion. All of these studies were conducted by international medical organizations. A more recent study, conducted by a research fellow at Johns Hopkins University, also supports the ABC link."
...No less than The New York Times, ABC News, and the Atlanta-Journal Constitution (AJC) have, in the last few days, reported on the benefits that breastfeeding provides mothers. In a bold headline, The New York Times declared, "Breast-Feeding Is Good for Mothers, Not Just Babies, Studies Suggest."
Most significantly, one study shows that "breast-feeding may help protect women from a particularly vicious type of breast cancer." As the AJC puts it, "Researchers found that mothers who breastfeed reduce their risk of a particularly aggressive type of breast cancer by 20 percent."...
Of course, it is seemingly lost on these liberals that an abortion violently, abruptly, and unnaturally interrupts all of this.
(Excerpt) Read more at trevorgrantthomas.com ...
Perhaps the only time the MSM is willing to ignore breasts.
It's all for the Revolution, doncha' know...
The American Cancer Society once supported Big Tobacco’ s denial of smoking-lung cancer link.
As a woman goes through a pregnancy, the breast tissue begins to go through changes that hormonally prepare the breasts for breastfeeding.
To use a layman's language - the cells of the lobes which prepare milk are opened and slowly close after the birth of the baby when the mother begins to breastfeed. If a woman does not breastfeed after the birth of the baby the breast cells will close naturally and hormonally. Although it is best to breastfeed at least a little bit to make sure.
When a woman has a spontaneous miscarriage the hormones kick in the way they do after a full pregnancy when the hormones do their work to shut off the system, so to speak.
Now, if a woman has an abortion, these cells remain open and do not close because they are given the hormonal signal to close. When the cells remain open they have no protection from invading cancer cells. That is why breastfeeding is one of the best ways to protect the breasts from getting cancer.
To sum it up - an abortion keeps the breast tissue in an open position which is an invitation to cancer.
There’s no denial of it outside the borders of The Land of Free Speech.
Now, if a woman has an abortion, these cells remain open and do not close because they are NOT given the hormonal signal to close.
In other words, newly developing breast cells crash against a hormonal brick wall. (They’re Not wearing their pink ribbons.)
Ha! So true!
Absolutely right! In fact, big boobs are all you need to be the next super star.
And .. then they end up in bed with multiple partners; end up pregnant; end up having abortion after abortion.
However, I’m hoping it will finally become information young women can use to make that choice to have unprotected sex .. believing that having an abortion is a safe practice.
Lots of prayers are needed to get more and more women to see the truth of their breast cancer.
And .. not all women who have breast cancer .. had an abortion .. but they may have had a miscarriage .. and they had no idea breast cancer might be a result.
Yes, I’m really surprised that the media stumbled this way. These new studies make it harder to continue to hide the truth.
GREAT Post! I’ve been wondering aloud this morning what was the biological difference between an abortion and a miscarriage. THANKS!
They never call me!
When I tried to breast feed my mother told me she only liked me as a friend.
Yes-—this has been suppressed for decades. It fits the Malthusian, demonic “meme”.
No Truth is ever allowed in the public square since they banned Jesus Christ from the public square and schools using “Just Law”.
Censorship has been with us since forever....the Malthusians, though, had the Germans/Fichte and Wundt as their base to know how to create minds like the Hitler Youth-—Prussian mandatory public schools-—and then by 1920s and 30s, they got control over the newspapers, textbooks and universities (science) and radio. Marketing was controlled by Freud’s nephew, Bernays, to get women to smoke, etc. It worked.
You hear on MSM-—including “fair and balance” Fox News——what the Malthusian, sodomite elites WANT you to “think” (over and over and it becomes the “truth’). All your emotions are artificially controlled-—they want you dehumanized-—destroying mother/child bond and forcing mom into the work force was No. 1 target.
To dehumanize you start with removing human touch from the infant-—esp. that mother/child skin/skin loving “touch” and holding while nursing (bonding).
Destroy bonding in a baby and you will destroy all future relationships. You will be an emotional cripple-—and owned by vice—unless you find God.
The Mob of Political Correctness will happily stand truth on its head to deny ANY scientific study.
Science has become a weapon of State Security, which is why they spend so much time and energy spreading pabulum about climate change.
Best explanation I ever heard. Thanks for your post.
It was my pleasure.
You are welcome.
Ha! Classic Dangerfield!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.