Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Dawkins deserves credit for going after Hoax Boy. Normally, atheist crusaders restrict their criticism of religion to Christianity, because A. they know they won't be shot or blown up for attaching Christianity and B. it's not politically correct to attack religious beliefs, however extreme, violent, and bizarre, when they're practiced by non-western, non-white peoples.

The response from many of Dawkins' fans is interesting: these "fearless atheists" suddenly become defenders of Islamic fundamentalism, e.g.

"I used to look up to you. Your books opened my mind (when) I was a kid. Now you're doing sloppy reactionary thinking; saddens me," tweeted Renee Stephen.

Too funny!

1 posted on 11/25/2015 9:11:02 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ek_hornbeck

FINALLY someone nailed Pre-Jihadist Clock Boy.


2 posted on 11/25/2015 9:15:18 AM PST by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

Dawkins goes after people who use religion as an excuse to do wrong things.


4 posted on 11/25/2015 9:24:52 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck
"Normally, atheist crusaders restrict their criticism of religion to Christianity" God is Not Great photo: God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything GodIsNotGreatHowReligionPoisonsEver.jpg Atheist crusader (odd choice of wording) Christopher Hitchens (RIP) condemned Islam with this book responding to the savages' constant cries: `Allahu ackbar' (`God is great') and, as shown by the book cover, Hitchens actually attacked religion generally. He sheltered Salman Rushdie (`The Satanic Verses') in his own home when the savages were carrying out a fatwa, trying to kill, and succeeding with some, anyone close to Rushdie. Newly naturalized American Hitchens was a strong supporter of the war on the savages. In point of fact, the Catholic church criticized Rushdie strongly and supported their muslim counterparts--something like the support the Church gave to the Nazis in WWII, Swede-like, at least until the tide turned--and demonstrated the pusillanimity that you attribute to non-believers like Dawkins and Hitchens.
7 posted on 11/25/2015 9:38:01 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

“whose school project was mistaken for a bomb”

It was a “school project?” For what class?


9 posted on 11/25/2015 9:45:36 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

And now the reptiles begin to devour each other. Our job is to increase the feeding frenzy.


10 posted on 11/25/2015 9:51:28 AM PST by olepap (Your old Pappy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

For once I agree with Dawkins.

The pre-jihadist must not win that lawsuit. I hope the jury is smart enough.

Question - what would happen if that kid was trying to board a plane with that “clock”?


11 posted on 11/25/2015 9:52:19 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

As atheists go, I followed Christopher Hitchens, as well as Sam Harris and sometimes Dawkins.

I don’t agree with them, but found them intellectually honest, and not prone to slogans. Sam Harris especially admits that he respects Christians much more than others, because, the simple fact is, they do not condone or promote religious violence as Muslims do.


12 posted on 11/25/2015 9:54:58 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck
Dawkins is right, and his attacking atheist buddies are so ideological! Kinda' humorous!

As far as agreeing with Dawkins, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

14 posted on 11/25/2015 10:30:11 AM PST by Patriotic1 (Dic mihi solum facta, domina - Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

demanding $15 million in damages

Might be good legal advise to read the Texas law regarding the plaintiff pays when their lose.

It will be a very short trial if these camel-jockies are actually stupid enough to sue. Once in court the truth of who “made” the device and who put the dumbass kid up to do it will come out and shazam they will be gone back to sandwormland.


17 posted on 11/25/2015 11:46:43 AM PST by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

If they file that lawsuit the State of Texas should immediately dismiss it and sanction the lawyer who helped bring it


18 posted on 11/25/2015 2:03:03 PM PST by Mr. K (If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson