Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Principled

Of course I read what you posted. Did you read what I posted?

I don’t believe it is right, no matter who it is or who their mom is.

It has been made right by twisting what the law says, parsing what it says by what a common sense meaning of the Founders would be.

I understand you are fine with this, I am not. And the logical conclusion is that one day, someone will use this interpretation of the law to give you a leader you will regret much more than Obama.


102 posted on 11/26/2015 10:13:55 AM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Duchess47

Wow it’s no parsing at all. I didn’t say I was fine with it either...you made that up too. What I’m fine with is following the law.

It’s what the law clearly said. No parsing. Nothing left to interpretation at all.

A mother under the age of 18 had to have been living in the US for five years prior to the birth. 0bama’s mom did not meet those conditions. Hence 0bama was not born a citizen per the law. Cruz however does meet the conditions required by law at the time of his birth hence he does meet the lawful definition.

I don’t know why you’re fine ignoring the law. You don’t have to like it and you clearly do not. But the law is the law.

Argue whether you think the law should be different if you like..,but simply ignoring the law is dumb.


104 posted on 11/26/2015 10:33:22 AM PST by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson