Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FunkyZero
If I’m forced to use one, I guess I can always drill a hole through it and just utilize the regular mag strip

I frankly don't think the fraud committed on my account was because of the chip, but the chip sure didn't stop it.

Unless I'm mistaken, these chips are not RF chips which can be read remotely, but require physical contact with the card reader.


19 posted on 11/26/2015 10:08:46 AM PST by 867V309 (Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: 867V309

You know, I guess I should have looked more closely. I just assumed this was the RFID baloney... that’s why I cut it up


26 posted on 11/26/2015 10:39:44 AM PST by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: 867V309

We’ve had chip cards in Canada now for some 5 years or more. Where before you would have swiped and then signed (possibly electronically), with the signature using being ignored (who ever actually looks to see the signature matches the one on the back of the card?), now you would just insert the card in the chip reader and punch in your PIN. More secure mostly against duplicate cards made by duplicating the mag stripe - the chip is supposed to be secure, although I understand that its encryption has been broken.

Lately all the new cards here have “tap” RF (NFC) technology. This is typically only good up to $100, maybe $200 for gas. I don’t worry about it, because if there’s a fraudulent charge, it’s the bank’s problem, not mine.


38 posted on 11/26/2015 1:59:07 PM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson