To: Uncle Miltie
ADM is part of the problem as are the people who get a piece of the corn gravy train from them. If this crap really worked, it would grow sorghum which makes ethanol more cheaply and efficiently than corn.
And it wouldn't need to be subsidized by the other 44 or so states which don't grown corn for ethanol.
20 posted on
12/01/2015 1:04:20 PM PST by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Vigilanteman
If this crap really worked, it would grow sorghum which makes ethanol more cheaply and efficiently than corn. The ethanol mandate is not tied to corn. If sorghum was really cheaper to produce ethanol, there is not a reason to use corn instead.
34 posted on
12/01/2015 1:14:58 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Vigilanteman
Sorghum (aka milo) is indeed used to produce fuel ethanol in places that are drier (Kansas, California) than most of the Corn Belt. It does not have a price advantage over corn, except in local areas.
There is no mandate to use corn to make fuel ethanol.
37 posted on
12/01/2015 1:33:14 PM PST by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson