Posted on 12/04/2015 4:52:59 AM PST by McGruff
Hillary Clinton answered a question about Bill Clinton's alleged sexual impropriety on Thursday, saying that victims of sexual abuse "should be believed" until evidence disproves their allegations.
At a campaign stop in Hooksett, New Hampshire, a woman asked Clinton: "Secretary Clinton, you recently came out to say that all rape victims should be believed. But would you say that Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones be believed as well?"
Clinton responded: "Well, I would say that everyone should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence."
(Excerpt) Read more at wmur.com ...
“... I would say that everyone should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence.”
O U C H !!
A question you’ll never hear on a national debate. What hypocrites.
In other words, we should believe the accusations of Broaddrick, Willey and Jones.
Chickens coming home to roost.
She still didn’t answer the question. And she’s saying all those women are lying.
Not only will the question not be asked in a debate or ever again at a press conference, this poor reporterette’s new job will probably be at WFRZ in Frozen Moosebutt, Alaska.
I think this was a plant
The people in her crowds are vetted as are the questions.
Satan’s Prom Queen can now claim she has answered that question.
I can’t seem to find a live video of the event...when I saw it on teevee, it appeared by hilLIEry’s body language she was surprised ...IIRC she leaned back in her chair as if dodging a thrown shoe.
By the way her answer upends completely our system of justice in which all defendants are innocent until proven guilty.
Do people realize how sick and dangerous it will be to “believe”certain allegedly aggrieved groups without the need for evidence first?
We are in an unthinking country and its going to destroy us.
No, men are not guilty until proven innocent. Bill Clinton is guilty because the evidence against him was obvious.
I'm surprised someone asked it at all! Doesn't Hillary! screen her questioners anymore? How did one brave soul slip in?
I agree with you. Shrillary looked too calm and relaxed when she answered that question as if she were expecting it, and her wooden response to it makes it look as if she were coached and rehearsed her comment. It was all a charade and made to look, as you have nailed, an opportunity for her campaign to say she answers tough questions.
I found a Reuters version:
I didn’t recall properly...she seems to withdraw after her snarky answer.
I disagree...Trump is going to hammer her on this with Ivanka standing next to him.
No, she is saying there was no credible evidence to support a rape charge from any of those women.
Yes, he was found to be a liar by the court and forced to cough up his law license.
Willey & Broderick never came to trial. So she’s blowing hot hair again. Even her “ands” and “buts” are lies.
“Yes, he was found to be a liar by the court and forced to cough up his law license.”
And yet no one is allowed to know why the Fraud and his “wife” did the same....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.