Posted on 12/04/2015 4:52:59 AM PST by McGruff
A pre-fabricated (dissembling) reply to a foreseen and anticipated question.
Yes Trump or Cruz will hammer her on this but the question was still a plant
Unlike the Fraud, I don’t think she ever goes off-script.
Right...Hillary is such a crud POS... there’s NOTHING authentic or genuine about her... except possibly her greed and naked ambition which NOTHING can conceal.
Can anyone explain how these felons have avoided prison time?
“Can anyone explain how these felons have avoided prison time?”
Every once in a while I catch Hannity on the radio and he has some leftist sidekick woman (Tamara?) on occasionally and whenever he says anything negative about 42’s wife, she says, “I’m no Hillary supporter, but...” and proceeds to defend her and refuses to admit she ever lied about anything.
Just like all the Hussein Heads.
Big Media pours out the love for Democrats and there are a lot of cattle in America, for whom nothing is more important than the {Democrat} Party.
Democrat GOOD, Republican BAD is all that matters to so many.
My son was at this event. He sent me a couple of videos and his closing statement in his email to me was ‘Go Trump!”
“I don’t care if you have a video of him raping a woman and then shooting her dead, you’re not going to be able to get 60 votes to impeach him”
Maybe Chuck Todd or George Stephanopoulos can look into these Clinton rape stories... they’re ‘journalists’ right? Not left wing political hacks pretending to be journalist... right?
Stephanopoulos has the advantage... he knew the Clintons when Bill was doing the rapes (alleged?) - and when Hillary was trashing the women with ‘sluts and nuts’ bullying.
Sorry Chuck Todd - George has the inside track on getting to the truth - not that either of you would ever look... Then again I’m sure if George Bush had credible rape charges against him that both of you would have given Bush a pass. Or even Trump. All fair with that level playing field... no bias from you two.
Wake up NBC and CBS the ‘little people’ are catching on to the lies.
Have you ever noticed that the media only fact checks Republicans? Wonder why that is.
And the follow-up question should have been -
"Especially when the accused lies under oath?"
2007 FR story -— Hillary denies knowing who Broaddrick is
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1865782/posts
They may be stupid, but they are true believers in socialism.
Interesting post, but I don't see the "little people" catching on to squat.
Thread winner!
(although the 1 out of 3 graphic was a close second!)
Thanks for pointing out this hugely important point.
She may not be authentic, but the American people would believe she was named for Sir Edmund Hillary if they had heard of Sir Edmund.
Hmmmm ..?? Sounded like a “canned” statement to me.
I mean, who was the “woman” who asked her the question ..??
I’ll bet it was somebody from the local group sponsoring Clinton’s appearance; or it was possibly somebody that the local people would not know .. and was the woman passing herself off as “media” ..??
This was waaaaaay too staged to be an off the cuff question.
Hillary’s usually careful NOT to allow real people anywhere near her... so it was odd.
Well, the Clintons are known for “staging answers” .. which means they make up a script .. and stage an answer to difficult questions.
They do this in order to be able to say, “Asked and answered”. Over, done, never to pass the lips of the media again.
See how that works ..????????????????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.