Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

“Why does your proposed constitutional amendment on marriage not require the states to only recognize one man one woman marriage.”

In my opinion, when he says this:

‘If you care about an issue, how about convincing your brothers and sisters, convincing your neighbors, convincing 320 million Americans, win at the ballot box. That’s called democracy.’

It is because he believes that state recognized ‘gay marriage’ would be legitimate as long as state legislatures or state referendums are the mechanism the state uses to accept ‘gay marriage’ for itself. Which would mean 50 state ‘gay marriage’ recognition inevitably in 20-25 years or so, at least if the trend of the popular votes continue.

Freegards


17 posted on 12/04/2015 8:01:06 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed

Well then he would be dead wrong. “Gay marriage” can never be legitimate, because laws or government policies that violate the laws of nature and nature’s God are illegitimate and therefore null and void, according to the principles this free republic, and western civilization, were founded upon.


20 posted on 12/04/2015 8:12:53 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson