Blame the JOOOOOOS
In this instance, this particular New York Daily News article, blame radical Born Again Christian/Messianic Jew(s), as Stasi described Nicholas Thalasinos to be.
Israel can be condemned next week, in some other article, and at the UN also. United Nations headquarters are in New York City, the "Big Apple", aren't they?
That's Stasi's main target, I think.
Not NYC, or the UN --- but Christians, and American ones most of all. They simply must be shut down, must be marginalized, since for the time being they cannot be entirely silenced. Marching orders for the day, the decade, the century (this one, and the last) for media; Any form of religious expression coming for *those kind* of people must be opposed. It's become innate, like when a physician taps a knee just so, the leg below the knee naturally & involuntarily jerks.
All religions, if they include concept of there being one God, are essence of goat-herder ignorance, according to the Bill Mahers of the world (who used to host a show called Politically Incorrect -- what a comedian!).
Christian expression (everyone knows) must be opposed most of all. Islamic militants (and lone-wolf husband & wife pair wackos) indiscriminately killing people, proves the point.
What more proof does anyone need? It makes perfect sense, the same way that blaming the NRA for violence that it's supporters do not commit makes sense, and miniskirts pretty-near almost justify rape (that would be rape-rape for Whoopi Goldberg-fan watchers of "The View"). So bag 'em with a burka --- just in case. We don't want guys walking around even thinking about it (rape-rape).
It's must be all the Christian's fault. They helped build a society that ended up allowing miniskirts. Therefore religion is wrong. Muslims agree wholeheartedly that religion is at fault -- except for their own religion-- the one that is dead set (and I do mean "dead") against mini-skirts. After adherents of Islam get done with serially raping the miniskirt wearers, of course...
That one religion (Islam) alone is the only one which should be allowed, or at least Not Criticized.
Muslims say (out of one side of their mouth) that there is no compulsion in religion, while otherwise striving to get in the position where they can forcefully compel all to submit to theirs. Talking heads, and writers at American style, liberal-infested hell-fonts like the New York Daily News appear to agree. Islam must not be criticized. Or if it is, then Christianity must be openly mocked, blamed and then damned by association & implication equally, at the same time. It's a religion. See one religion causing problems? Be fair and blame "Religion" itself, pointing to religious beliefs indiscriminately of what those are and what the fruit of those may be. Religion is the problem (besides, the Christian kind makes us feel bad for being such self-centered, egotistical jerks).
In this latest article from Stasi, Muslims going on pre-planned Sudden Jihad is equivalent to posting messages online which make disparaging remarks regarding Planned Parenthood, and criticizes here-in-the USA Muslim activism too.
So of course it must follow that this is the fault of Christianity. Whatever we do, let's not look at what is in Islam that supports violent rampaging of the kind mr. should-not-be-named husband & wife team engaged in, shooting more than 30 people, killing outright 14.
Oh! I know! Let's talk about Crusades, instead. Billy Graham, the white courtesy phone is a-ringing.
For those Muslims who may disagree with what I'm saying here, who would tell me that I don't understand Islam (and are still all butthurt over Crusades that occurred half millennium ago) take a look towards those who attempt to covert out of Muhammadanism in Muslim dominated societies, and see what happens to those people. They can be (and are, at times) killed for it, under Islamic-guided laws.
Israel and the Jooos are more distantly on the radar in regards to Stasi's latest screed, for the time being, I think.
But hey, everyone knows -- wipe out Christian support for Israel, and then the wolves can more easily circle the prey in the Middle East.
Ok, you're right. I spoke too soon. In the end it's still the Joooos after all that she is against.
And so she serves her Master, the one who says "there is no God" and "I'm as Good as your antiquated concept of God" echoing that rebellious angel, Lucifer (he was so beautiful, and proud of it too).
Meanwhile, NY Daily News reading (and writing?) New York City, anti-religion 'secular' Jooos are still ok because they reject religion (or at least keep their own on the down-low).
Don't ask --- don't tell? Why, if we'd all simply follow that sort of double-sided Clintonesque formulæ, and apply that here in regard to how we should regards Sudden Jihad syndrome sufferers, and blame the Joooos Christians, Peace would break out like it did right soon after the Oslo Accords were signed.
Thank you, Billy Jeff.