Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea hydrogen bomb: Kim Jong-un boasts of expanding nuclear arsenal
Yahoo UK ^ | Dec 10, 2015 | Vasudevan Sridharan

Posted on 12/10/2015 1:18:33 AM PST by matt1234

North Korea claims to have developed a new kind of nuclear weapon to add to its arsenal – the hydrogen bomb. It is still unclear whether the latest claim of Kim Jong-un is a gimmick or a real threat.

Pyongyang is capable of launching hydrogen bombs and not just nuclear weapons, declared the country's leader, Kim Jong-un. According to the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), he was speaking at Phyongchon Revolutionary Site, a historic venue for the regime, in the North Korean capital.

(Excerpt) Read more at uk.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dprk; hbomb; norks; northkorea; nucleararms; pyongyang; republicofkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2015 1:18:34 AM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt1234

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4vz5iSVoYw


2 posted on 12/10/2015 1:19:06 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Wouldn’t surprise me. The Soviets got the H Bomb five years after the fission bomb. Took us slightly longer, seven years (because we got there through science, not espionage). This is when things get scary.


3 posted on 12/10/2015 1:38:06 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Aren’t nuclear weapons H-Bombs? If they’ve only just developed them, weren’t the Norks armed with mere Atomic weapons rather than nukes?


4 posted on 12/10/2015 1:40:12 AM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

It’s hard, but not impossible. Once you have the trigger (fission bomb), the rest is a mechanical construction of cheap Lithium deuteride and U-238. Just build it right and test a few times and it’s a done deal.


5 posted on 12/10/2015 1:41:30 AM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

They only had ‘atomic’ ones, which are fission only. Perhaps boosted with tritium, which is simply gas that’s injected into the core right at explosion. Doubles the blast.

The Teller-Ulam thermonuclear design is a big harder, but hardly impossible once your have fission worked out.


6 posted on 12/10/2015 1:43:21 AM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Fission, fusion...they’re all nuclear weapons. It’s all about creating the chain reaction.


7 posted on 12/10/2015 1:55:53 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Can we give O’Bunghole another Nobel prize, or do we have to wait until after he achieves his final solution with the vaporization of Jeruselem?


8 posted on 12/10/2015 2:41:07 AM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Bamarama wants Tel Aviv not Jerusalem nuked. To many Hamas buddies in Jerusalem


9 posted on 12/10/2015 3:21:25 AM PST by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Careful now Kimmie boy....you may wind up like ole Saddam!


10 posted on 12/10/2015 3:27:26 AM PST by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

Nuclear weapon=fission, fusion

Fission=nuke, atomic,neutron, A-bomb

Fusion=nuke, hydrogen, thermonuclear, H-bomb

Atomic weapons are nukes

NK has fission nukes, A-bombs

All varieties will kill you.


11 posted on 12/10/2015 3:49:33 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Aren’t nuclear weapons H-Bombs?

No. Atomic bombs are fission reactions. Hydrogen bombs, or thermonuclear bombs, are fusion devices that use a fission reaction as a detonator.

Fusion gives off way much more energy.

12 posted on 12/10/2015 3:55:56 AM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Some quicker tha others, by nanoseconds.


13 posted on 12/10/2015 4:03:02 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

I think they’re full of it. They have the material and the technology to make an atomic bomb is seven years old. However, IMHO - they lack the technical expertise to remove the 240 from their available plutonium to make it weapons grade.


14 posted on 12/10/2015 5:14:08 AM PST by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

I dunno.....

....Just developing one does not ensure the ability to deliver it.

The first Hydrogen weapons that were developed weighed tons. Aircraft were devised to solely carry them (B-58 Hustler was one). It took decades of well funded research and a lot of dedicated, educated, well paid (and well fed) Scientists to develop fieldable weapons.

I think that the Norks would have a hard time delivering a fission weapon to the target due to size and weight problems. A hydrogen weapon is 10 times worse.


15 posted on 12/10/2015 5:23:24 AM PST by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Gotta get more fertilizer first.


16 posted on 12/10/2015 5:36:28 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
That's the trick, right? As I understand it - and I'm far from an expert in the field, just an engineer by temperament, training, and long experience... It is relatively easy, but in-efficient and limiting, to make a nuclear weapon from Uranium. The bigger bang-for-the-buck (and size, weight, etc) is from Plutonium. However refining Plutonium to the required purity levels (particularly removing the P-240 from the P-239) is extremely difficult. But you have to as the P-240 is so unstable it would cause pre-trigger and a fizzle.

Once you've solved all those physics/science/engineering problems you have to then solve a whole new set to make it small enough and rugged enough to transport to your target. Something between a shipping container and a small cone on the end of a missile - depending on how you intend to deliver it.

All that is a lot of sophisticated science and engineering for a Country that has demonstrated it has a hard time with (relatively) simple "rocket science." Though they are getting better, in fits and starts, at that. They are probably advancing in nuclear weapons technology too. Hard to gauge progress (both for us and them) when they aren't testing actual devices...

17 posted on 12/10/2015 6:27:21 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Aren’t nuclear weapons H-Bombs?

Nope. There are two types. Fission and fusion.

Fission devices are called single stage and use either Uranium or Plutonium cores to create the fission and thus the effects.

Fusion devices are two stage (sometimes more) that use a fission core, the first stage, to compress a second stage that create a fusion reaction. This creates much more devastating effects.

18 posted on 12/10/2015 6:43:08 AM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

More likely a boosted fission weapon.
North Korea fission weapons have been < 1kt yield because they (I think) have been using reactor grade Pu239 with Pu240 impurities.

Warhead pre-detonates before full implosion.
By placing Tritium in the center of the core, you can boost the yield and thus call it an “H-bomb”

Russians did this on their first “H-bomb” but the rest were real multi-stage weapons.


19 posted on 12/10/2015 6:46:46 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
Fission, fusion...they're all nuclear weapons.

6 0f 1, a dozen and a half of the other. LOL.

20 posted on 12/10/2015 6:51:04 AM PST by Stentor (RIP -- Nicholas Thalasinos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson