Posted on 12/18/2015 11:37:49 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Many questioned Barack Obama’s judgment when he backed away from his own “red line” in Syria, but Chuck Hagel tells Foreign Policy in an exclusive interview that it was actually worse than that. Obama lost his nerve, Hagel alleges, calling off promised strikes on Syria after Bashar al-Assad’s use of chemical weapons. Hagel also says that Obama’s team then stabbed him in the back as he was heading for the exits, and tried to “destroy me”:
Jet-lagged from a long overseas trip, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel had just sat down with his wife for a quiet dinner at an upscale Italian restaurant in northern Virginia when his phone rang. It was the White House on the line. President Barack Obama wanted to speak with him.
It was Aug. 30, 2013, and the U.S. military was poised for war. Obama had publicly warned Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad that his regime would face consequences if it crossed a “red line†by employing chemical weapons against its own people. Assad did it anyway, and Hagel had spent the day approving final plans for a barrage of Tomahawk cruise missile strikes against Damascus. U.S. naval destroyers were in the Mediterranean, awaiting orders to fire.
Instead, Obama told a stunned Hagel to stand down. Assad's Aug. 21 chemical attack in a Damascus suburb had killed hundreds of civilians, but the president said the United States wasn't going to take any military action against the Syrian government. The president had decided to ignore his own red line — a decision, Hagel believes, that dealt a severe blow to the credibility of both Obama and the United States. …
In the days and months afterward, Hagel's counterparts around the world told him their confidence in Washington had been shaken over Obama's sudden about-face. And the former defense secretary said he still hears complaints to this day from foreign leaders.
"A president's word is a big thing, and when the president says things, that's a big deal," he said.
Hagel didn’t just order up the strikes on a whim. Obama had publicly announced his red line, and the consequences of crossing it — a military response from the US. Hagel had prepared for that contingency. The retreat was just one in a series of moves that Hagel cites in the interview that demonstrate a lack of strategic or even tactical thinking from Obama and his team.
Instead, Hagel told FP, politics was the priority, not national security or a coherent foreign policy:
Hagel said the politically motivated micromanagement, combined with a mushrooming bureaucracy at the National Security Council, raises a real risk for the executive branch -- potentially undercutting the proper functioning of the Pentagon and other cabinet offices.
"There is a danger in all of this," he said. "This is about governance; this isn't about political optics. It's about making the country run and function, and trying to stay ahead of the dangers and the threats you see coming."
This raises a serious problem for Obama. So far, he has had four Secretaries of Defense — Robert Gates, Leon Panetta, Hagel, and the current SecDef, Ash Carter. All three who have departed Obama’s administration have leveled serious criticisms of the way in which security and military issues have been handled. Hagel’s allegations are the most serious of them all, but fits the pattern suggested by the memoirs of his predecessors.
Hagel sealed his fate when he refused to go along with the White House’s desire to empty Guantanamo Bay. He blocked transfers based on threat assessments from within the Department of Defense, and that angered the White House. In the end, Hagel — who didn’t have a lot of credibility for this position in the first place — found himself isolated and outmatched politically.
Perhaps not for much longer, though. Hagel will certainly produce his own memoirs soon enough, and those may prove even more intriguing than Gates’ or Panetta’s.
Don’t cry now Haggey, you should have spoke up when it happened.
Before he writes his memoirs, he should avoid solo kayak trips or Ft. Marcy Park outings.
Once Obama is gone you can bet there will be all kinds of juicy stories coming out from “unnamed sources”.
Chuck lays down with dogs and gets fleas. Poor Chuck.
It was the rebels that used gas, not Assad. Assad gave them up quickly after the accusation just for that reason.
The red line was an Obama scam.
My opinion? It doesn’t matter. It’s not our mess. Just help to arm the Kurds to fight ISIS.
He is what a Democrat/GOPe who cares
Yeah, that sure was suspicious. Obama wants to launch airstrikes for the rebels. Then he announces chemical weapon are a red line and he’ll attack.
A week later, bada bing* a very odd chemical attack that made no sense and didn’t look “military”.
That was a total scam designed to bring in the F-18s.
If a drunken imbecile like Hagel says our policy is confused we have a lot to be worried about.
Poor Chuck...same guy who undermined, criticized and ran his big mouth about everything when he was a senator seemed to find out that it’s much harder being on the inside and having to actually do the job. Poetic justice.
Thank God for Putin and Russia.
Both sides were using them, and for quite a while before the press reported on it. Assad “gave them up” after Obama backed down but of course there is no way to verify that he did give them up.
The claim that it was the rebels that used gas was from Seymour Hersh, who is rather notorious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.