Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wow! SpaceX Lands Orbital Rocket Successfully in Historic First
Space.com ^ | 21DEC2015 | Mike Wall

Posted on 12/21/2015 8:08:25 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Neil DeGrasse Tyson: “Elon Musk’s SpaceX Won’t Get Us To Mars”
Published on Sep 5, 2013
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson said Elon Musk’s company SpaceX will not be the first to colonize Mars. In fact, no private enterprise will be taking humans to the Red Planet, according to the director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space. Find out more with John Iadarola!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW74vsCNQtc


41 posted on 12/22/2015 12:38:37 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
That's just magnificent.

Well done, SpaceX.

42 posted on 12/22/2015 12:45:58 AM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvBjkkSe4oU


43 posted on 12/22/2015 12:51:31 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
OK, I'll bite.

While I agree that this is an "accomplishment", it's not a "great accomplishment." The real issue with reusable launch vehicles is not whether it can be done, but rather if it can be done to make economic sense.

A launch system is made up of much more than the vehicle -- it's the manufacturing infrastructure, preparation and launch facilities, and the cost and difficulty of refurbishing and reusing the "reusable" vehicle. Reusable does not equal cheap -- Shuttle was a reusable system; the reason it was expensive is because it took a lot of man-hours of highly skilled workers to refurbish the vehicle for reuse.

Because SpaceX is a non-public company, we have no idea what it took to develop the recoverable (and that's all that has been shown for now) first stage. Even Musk does not know how much it will cost to operate a hypothetical reusable Falcon 9 system because he doesn't have one yet. Yes, he has successfully landed a Falcon 9 first stage booster and yes, that is something. But it's not what his cheerleaders and the facile analyses of a brainless space media claim.

The determining factor as to whether this is an advance or not is if SpaceX can put a payload into orbit cheaper than what they are now charging. We don't know that now and may not know it for several years. After a single booster flies five or six times, and the price for launching a satellite comes down, then I'll grant you his "great accomplishment."

Oh, and all of Musk's talk about colonies on Mars is still pure BS. He still doesn't have a clue as to what a single human Mars mission would take, let alone the establishment of a self-sustaining settlement there.

44 posted on 12/22/2015 12:56:18 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

It is s lower energy profile to simply drop downrange. Turning around and coming back takes somewhat more fuel. The new and improved v1.1 Falcon has that margin on many more launch profiles. (Payload weight and orbit height)


45 posted on 12/22/2015 12:56:52 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Reducing price per pound per orbit by 90% so far, the intent behind this reusability is to cut that last 10% by 90%. Spectacular, if they can pull it off. What will happen of course is, NASA will continue to fund various companies and then cut the amount paid to SpaceX.


46 posted on 12/22/2015 1:34:40 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

That Falcon 9 failure in the summer was the first, and was the first real bump in the road since those Pacific island launch failures.


47 posted on 12/22/2015 1:42:26 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

I got a 5’ cardboard sit-inside Gemini capsule with control panel one Christmas (wayyyy cool), watched rocket launches in paused classes, took pics of our TV screen, built the Gemini and Saturn and Apollo/lander models.

Miss that feeling of awe and pride. Got some back just now!

It felt good when America was great.


48 posted on 12/22/2015 2:50:53 AM PST by polymuser ( Enough is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Okay, jealousy is starting to sit in. My parents were not impressed at all and did not care. If it didn’t have anything to do with the Dallas Cowboys, then it wasn’t important.


49 posted on 12/22/2015 3:10:36 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Hearing all the SpaceX employees chanting USA was great, too.

Must have been molar-grinding time for Barky. Here he thought he'd neutered all those white boys by turning NASA into a "Moslem outreach" agency ..... and damned if the pimply-faced engineering crowd didn't go private and do The Forbidden on their own, anyway.

OBAMA <cue Larry Olivier voice, in character as The Mahdi>:

"I forbade it! .... I FORBADE IT!!!"

</off movie reference>

50 posted on 12/22/2015 4:28:18 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house , the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutierrez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“and the methane-burning engine will be needed because methane fuel is available on Mars”

NASA says that there isn’t any methane on Mars.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-285

It just suddenly disappeared! Completely unexpected!

Currently Falcon Heavy is scheduled to lift off sometime in May 2016.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches


51 posted on 12/22/2015 5:20:55 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

I guess “pull my finger” won’t catch on over on Mars. Too bad. ;’D Thanks Jack!


52 posted on 12/22/2015 5:25:45 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

The space industry has been charging $10K/lb to lift anything into orbit. SpaceX has gotten that down to about $1,500/lb. Isn’t that a big accomplishment?

If he can refurbish these boosters at a reasonable cost then the cost/lb. will drop even further. Musk has talked in the past about a figure of $500/lb. or even lower.


53 posted on 12/22/2015 5:25:58 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I think it is just NASA trying to discourage anyone from going to Mars. Every other probe or lander has detected it up until now. If they find large amounts of water on Mars then they can go the LH2/LOX route for fueling the return rockets.


54 posted on 12/22/2015 5:28:27 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
The space industry has been charging $10K/lb to lift anything into orbit. SpaceX has gotten that down to about $1,500/lb. Isn't that a big accomplishment?

ULA sells the low-end Atlas V for about $165 million. The 401 (no solids) puts 9797 kg into a 28 degree inclination LEO. That works out to be about $7600 per pound (not "$10K"). The Falcon 9 costs $61.2 M and can put 13,150 kg into the same orbit. That works out to about $2116 lb. Yes, less cost -- by about a factor of 3.5, not almost 10. I agree that's an accomplishment, as I said in my original post.

If he can refurbish these boosters at a reasonable cost then the cost/lb. will drop even further.

Perhaps. Perhaps not. It all depends on; 1) accounting for the loss of performance by making the first stage recoverable; 2) the cost of retrieval, refurbishment and preparation for relaunch; 3) the life cycle costs of a reusable first stage; 4) the reliability of that reused stage, including any additional launch insurance costs for a less reliable reused stage. None of these factors are known (or even forseeable) now -- get back to me when he has an operational system.

Musk has talked in the past about a figure of $500/lb. or even lower.

I'm sure he has said this -- he famous for saying incredibly silly things.

55 posted on 12/22/2015 6:03:11 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

How much fuel is wasted turning it around and stopping it’s forward momentum.

You think it would be more economical to let it coast 3/4 of the way around and land it in California.


56 posted on 12/22/2015 6:11:40 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Bezos appears the real deal on space biz, Musk seems just a govt program kinda guy - to me as a barely informed observer.


57 posted on 12/22/2015 7:39:40 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
MongoLanding


58 posted on 12/22/2015 7:42:26 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Amazon founder Jeff Bezo's private space company Blue Origin has completed a 'historic'
test flight, after sending a craft to space before successfully landing it on Earth.
____________________________________________

Jeff Bezos shows off the concept for Blue Origin’s launch system ...
____________________________________________

Contact
____________________________________________

Poster Contact

59 posted on 12/22/2015 7:42:26 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

60 posted on 12/22/2015 8:45:50 AM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson