One of the worst things about homo hitch ups sanctioned by the state is that poor little innocent children get placed with these immoral, depraved homosexual couplings. So it is an issue and also happens to coincide nicely with the decline of civilizations and crosses God’s word.
I am worried about this adoption situation personally as a relative’s infant is kind of up for grabs (mother can’t care for adequately). We pray that he not end up in one of these state-licensed debauchery factories.
And no voting for Cruz here if he in fact stands shoulder to shoulder with the homosexual lobby in his campaign appearances.
Yep. Homosexuality and SSM go against God’s natural order, and it destroys the moral fabric of families and entire societies. It is very dangerous situation for our children, therefore it should be one of the top priorities.
Was Cruz lobbying gay rights activists?
You are sadly misinformed. Cruz stands for the constitution and states rights.
Personally, I am worried about Muslim terrorists making surprise attacks within our country; about the growth of IsIS; about government over spending and over regulating; about unemployment; about a president who encourages racial divide... and a lot of other things.
I think your values are a little skewed.
I am going to restrain my indignancy for a moment in the hope that you really aren't as ass-backwards as this post would imply.
So, to educate you, it is in fact the homosexual lobby that has tried again and again to propel this issue into the national frame. It is generally the federal courts that have foisted this on us. In almost every case when it has been a state issue, state legislators and voters have reaffirmed their support for traditional marriage.
Your reference to Ted Cruz standing "shoulder to shoulder with the homosexual lobby" is not only insulting, and stupid, it's a flat-assed lie, even when you cleverly pose it as as a hypothetical.
Shame on you.
That’s a very important factor, and is something a non-homosexual Justice Department could address.
People might not like Huckabee but only Huckabee and Santorum will flat out say the decision was wrong and if elected will work to get it overturned. The rest, including Trump and Cruz will tap dance around it and say it’s a states rights issue. In other words in their minds if a liberal state votes for queer “marriage” then queer “marriage” is OK. That’s BS and they all know it but they don’t have the nerve to express their real feelings on the matter for fear of being labeled a homophobe. There needs to be a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman and end this nonsense once and for all.
Unfortunately, one of the places that that practice got started was Texas, during the Arbusto governorship in 1997. A woman employee of Child Protective Services discovered the adoptions being done on the sly and went public. She was fired instantly, unjustly and illegally, and without recourse. The story is archived at The New York Times and is recoverable (in abstract form) by metasearch.
The homosexual influence and even power under Bush 43 both in Texas and in his Administration was immense and well documented: Search under "Republican Unity Coalition", the gay front group run out of the Administration by a top Bush advisor.