[redfreedom]

You have a very valid point of view.

It’s an organization with lots of power. Something on the order of the UN that got off to a good start, great intentions, and wondered off the path.

Both have outlived their usefulness and are more dangerous than beneficial.

Considering the muzzie invasion of Europe, I’d say the same applies to the European Union.

Considering the leftist Uniparty takeover in DC, we are not far behind.

Things are so ripe for WWIII.

[Jumper]

US Embassy NATO is not the only Western country with a diplomatic missions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

The real problem is that Europe was never serious about defending itself because the cost of socialism was too high to maintain or justify a military. That required a strong US presence to unite under our military protection a coalition that was closer to the Socialist's Bloc under the Soviet Union. To believe that the US could just disengage its military from NATO is unreasonable because none of Europe's military is an organization without the USAF or US Army.