Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi Arabia Plans 'Thatcherite Revolution'
Sky News via Yahoo ^ | 1/7/2016

Posted on 01/07/2016 11:35:14 AM PST by EBH

Saudi Arabia is mulling the sale of shares in Aramco, believed to be the world's most valuable company, as part of plans to repair its finances and open up its economy.

The announcement was made by the country's deputy crown prince as Saudi's secretive, state-owned oil firm grapples with the effects of oil prices nearing 12-year lows .

Mohammed bin Salman told The Economist: "That is something that is being reviewed, and we believe a decision will be made over the next few months."

The Saudi economy has taken a battering from the oil price decline and the finance ministry announced last month it was to review its tax and spending regime after the country posted a record budget deficit of $98bn (£66bn) in its last financial year.

It (Other OTC: ITGL - news) was its second annual shortfall and it predicted a third for 2016 of $87bn (£58bn).

The ministry said then it could apply VAT to non-essential goods, raise charges on public services and raise the cost of heavily-subsidised power and fuel.

Mohammed bin Salman, who heads the kingdom's Supreme Council that oversees Aramco, went much further.

When asked if the country was planning a "Thatcherite revolution", he replied "Most certainly".

He told the magazine he was keen to privatise healthcare and education services and saw opportunities in other areas, such as defence and mining.

The prince, who is also defence minister in the Saudi government, believed non-oil revenues could reach $100bn over the next five years.

On the prospect of opening up Saudi Aramco, which officials told The Economist was worth "trillions" of dollars, he said: "Personally I’m enthusiastic about this step.

(Excerpt) Read more at uk.finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Egypt; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Israel; Japan; Russia; Syria; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Delaware; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: Maryland; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania; US: Tennessee; US: Texas; US: Vermont; US: Virginia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; alexistsipras; algore; antifracking; ar; aramco; arkansas; bencarson; bobbyjindal; california; carlyfiorina; chrischristie; crash; delaware; egypt; election2016; energy; epa; eritrea; europeanunion; fatah; financial; florida; fracking; france; gaza; germany; globalism; globalwarminghoax; governormoonbeam; greece; hamas; hillaryclinton; hitlery; hizbollah; iraq; japan; jebbush; jerrybrown; jihad; jimgilmore; jimwebb; joebiden; johnkasich; johnkerry; jordan; kentucky; kgb; kurdistan; lincolnchafee; lindseygraham; louisiana; marcorubio; martinomalley; maryland; massachusetts; md; methane; moonbeam; muslimworld; nato; newjersey; newyork; nj; ohio; oil; opec; patricelumumbaschool; pennsylvania; petroleum; popefrancis; putingaveiranthebomb; putinsbuttboys; randpaul; receptayyiperdogan; rhodeisland; ricksantorum; romancatholicism; russia; saudiarabia; sinai; southcarolina; syria; syriza; tedcruz; tennessee; texas; thatcherite; trump; turkey; unitedkingdom; virginia; vladtheimploder; vt; wassermanschultz; yemen
Beware what the other hand is doing. China and Saudi Arabia....both having serious financial troubles.
1 posted on 01/07/2016 11:35:14 AM PST by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EBH

The only difference is when Maggie Thatcher told British yobs to get off their butts and go back to work they did not respond by cutting her head off.


2 posted on 01/07/2016 11:39:29 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Only a fool would buy it. They took it from its rightful owners once, nothing to stop them from doing it again.


3 posted on 01/07/2016 11:50:15 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

This means they are going to make abortion legal?


4 posted on 01/07/2016 11:52:39 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH; kabar

The Saudi government selling the public shares in Aramco (as this article reports is being considered) might be a savvy move.

They need cash now for sure, but they could go a few years, just selling off sovereign wealth fund investments. Beyond that, they are taking real steps to reduce spending, which will give them more time.

So selling shares in Aramco could be a longer term strategic move. If they forecast that oil prices will be low structurally for the long haul (due to frakking and alternative energy developments), they might maximize their value by selling now, before the market catches up and devalues oil reserves.

I would guess that the Saudi government/family would keep a controlling interest Aramco, even if it does goes public.

Alternatively, such a sale might signal something other than an investment play. Current powerbrokers might just want to cash out while they personally can, or it might signal a different policy approach by the Salman regime, with wider implications.


5 posted on 01/07/2016 12:08:35 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I think it’s hilarious that the Saudis started this price decline in an attempt to thwart the growing competition from American fracking, only to lose control of the price and see their action boomerang back and smack them right between the eyes. Now they appear to be in full panic mode. The downside, of course, to this little comedy is that if their people rebel against them we could see something like ISIS in control of the Saudi oil fields.


6 posted on 01/07/2016 12:11:39 PM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Exactly what I thought. Just like GM stock.


7 posted on 01/07/2016 12:30:34 PM PST by smaug6 (We can't afford to be innocent!! Stand up and face the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Watch the woodwork -- the Thatcher bashers are about to come out of it. Thanks EBH.

8 posted on 01/07/2016 12:41:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: noiseman; All
The downside, of course, to this little comedy is that if their people rebel against them we could see something like ISIS in control of the Saudi oil fields.

Inasmuch as it would encourage American energy independence, I don't necessarily see this as a downside. Let Europe and Japan fight to protect their own energy supplies, eff 'em.
9 posted on 01/07/2016 12:44:49 PM PST by notdownwidems (Washington DC has become the enemy of free people everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

ISIS in control of the oil fields, interesting in that Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest financiers for ISIS.


10 posted on 01/07/2016 12:45:57 PM PST by EBH ( I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction. ~~ Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: notdownwidems

Better to have an enemy that acts like an enemy, than an enemy that acts like a friend.


11 posted on 01/07/2016 12:46:12 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EBH
However, the capital raised by making Saudi Aramco public could make it possible for Saudi Arabia to open up a LOT more potential oilfields in the Arabian Peninsula, even if they have to use fracking and fluid/gas injection to get the oil. Despite what you think about Islam, we forget Muslims historically can have a lot of savvy business sense, given the history of the Arabian Peninsula as the crossroads of goods trade from well before the time of Christ (the prophet Mohammed was a traveling merchant based in Mecca early in his life).
12 posted on 01/07/2016 1:32:00 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I recently read a book review in the WSJ of a new Thatcher biography.

Thatcher didn’t like it when Reagan invaded Grenada without telling her. Queen Elizabeth was queen of Grenada under the Commonwealth.


13 posted on 01/07/2016 1:38:22 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Does that mean Saudi women will be able to ride in the front seat of the car and...gasp...drive?


14 posted on 01/07/2016 3:56:49 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

Well stated, noiseman. The Saudis also seem to be losing control of the war in Syria and in Yemen - and those would be expensive mistakes.


15 posted on 01/09/2016 6:40:48 PM PST by BlackVeil ('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson