That is what he is asking for. He simply used a different term.
Me too.
Great ideas, yes, and from many of you, for a Convention of States. Doesn’t Abbott know the difference? A Constitutional Convention is NOT just talking about new amendments. I t is extremely dangerous in the present political climate.
Why in the world would anyone think a Con Con is a good idea, if they’ve read Matthew Bracken’s books? Amendments, yes, Con Con no.
As one poster said, “the left will just hijack it.” And as Citizen Zed said, âLeave the U.S. CONSTITUTION alone! Enforce what it says.â
I tried to clean this up to get the weird symbols out of it. Near impossible. Really tired of this!