[gusty]

Sander’s statement fails the logic test. Of course Clinton’s sexual history is relevant to the character and judgement of Herself. She married the guy for goodness sake. To marry and then stay married to a total lowlife is a serious flaw in one’s character. Would it not be relevant if a candidate was married to porn star or high end hooker. Of course it would be. The very fact would cast doubt on the candidates judgement. If a candidate’s husband is a serial adulterer at best, or a rapist at worse, of course it is an indication of character.

[gusty]

To add, the only scenario where Herself would not have to answer for Slick would be if she divorced him back in the 80’s.

[certrtwngnut]

Remember a person named Bawney Fwank? He had a boyfriend/pimp in his house & the dems in Massatwoshits kept electing him.