“I think [Jackie] should have been named in the first place,†she said in an interview. The “protection†of anonymity the media grants accusers “was never an appropriate one for journalists to afford, because it implies that we know what party deserves protection when someone brings charges of rape. It implies that we can determine guilt or innocence.â€
To: outpostinmass2
The truth doesn’t matter. What matters is the seriousness of the charges.
2 posted on
01/12/2016 8:51:09 AM PST by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: outpostinmass2
4 posted on
01/12/2016 9:01:49 AM PST by
MUDDOG
To: outpostinmass2
Lots of incentive to make a false charge of rape, because there is zero disincentive not to.
No prison. No charges. Don’t have to see a doctor. Won’t have to reveal your name. Universities have eliminated due process, but will heap support on anyone claiming to be a victim.
So have at it girls.
Don’t like fraternities? Rape!
That guy won’t ask you out? Rape!
That TEA party protestor? Rape!
5 posted on
01/12/2016 9:02:04 AM PST by
kidd
To: outpostinmass2
The person being protected in this story is ‘Jackie’s’ father, IMO.
6 posted on
01/12/2016 9:07:37 AM PST by
Lorianne
To: outpostinmass2
Maybe because she doesn’t exist?
7 posted on
01/12/2016 9:19:39 AM PST by
Tax-chick
(Maximizing my cultural appropriation.)
To: outpostinmass2
She hasn't even been expelled.
Unbelievable.
9 posted on
01/12/2016 9:41:34 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
To: outpostinmass2
“false” is a difficult word. The story was actually “fake but accurate”.
To: outpostinmass2
Her identity has already been made public. Not by the MSM, but by Charles C. Johnson of gotnews.com.
Her real name is “Jacqueline Coakley”.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson