Wow. The first thing that tells me is that with supporters who lie like Beck, Cruz isn’t very ethical himself. Beck would have not done that without implied okay.
Thanks for the article.
Not a thing wrong here. DT lies are fine. All lies are now accepted. DT started it. get what you ask for. Lololol. It is about to explode. I expect Sarah to endorse Teddy very soon.
That tree house web site is what we call the Media Matters. Or Saloon!!
I won't even bother posting the link, because nothing will be done by law enforcement/DOJ/state election commissions/state Secretaries of State (who oversee state elections) to harm the Washington Elite/Insider candidate who, if he wins, could cause them a world of trouble.
Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses
(b) Fraudulent misrepresentation. 2 U.S.C. § 441h Section 441h prohibits fraudulently representing one's authority to speak for a federal candidate or political party. As a result of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the provision contains two specific prohibitions:
Section 441h(a) forbids a federal candidate or an agent of a federal candidate from misrepresenting his or her authority to speak, write, or otherwise act for any other federal candidate or political party in a matter which is damaging to that other candidate or political party. For example, Section 441h(a) would prohibit an agent of federal candidate A from issuing a statement that was purportedly written by federal candidate B and which concerned a matter which was damaging to candidate B.
Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses
(b) Fraudulent misrepresentation. 2 U.S.C. § 441h Section 441h prohibits fraudulently representing one's authority to speak for a federal candidate or political party. As a result of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the provision contains two specific prohibitions:
Section 441h(a) forbids a federal candidate or an agent of a federal candidate from misrepresenting his or her authority to speak, write, or otherwise act for any other federal candidate or political party in a matter which is damaging to that other candidate or political party. For example, Section 441h(a) would prohibit an agent of federal candidate A from issuing a statement that was purportedly written by federal candidate B and which concerned a matter which was damaging to candidate B.