There’s a big difference between national forests and national monuments.
I’m not expert but I know I can hunt, cut firewood and Christmas trees, run livestock and secure logging contracts on (some) national forests.
My understanding is that a national monument is more akin to a wilderness designation—in other words far more restrictive in what uses the land can be put to.
Am I wrong?
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Whitey.
what you write is largely correct.
..............
so what?
what I don’t like,
are people who think everything
they see belongs to them.