>>> I’m still looking for the first woman presidential candidate for whom it is hardly relevant that she is a woman.
Depending on how one interprets your statement, Cankles might qualify. After all, “it is hardly relevant that she is a woman.”... or is that it is relevant that she is hardly a woman... Oh well, back to the drawing board.
My point is that a candidates’ sex ought not be relevant in the consideration of that person as a candidate. It is not a qualification for office.