Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump just declared his intent to destroy American democracy
The Washington Post ^ | 2/26/2016 | Erik Wemple

Posted on 02/27/2016 1:57:52 PM PST by dschapin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-290 next last
To: HarleyLady27

No, he said he inherited it, not that it was merely “given” to him.


41 posted on 02/27/2016 2:11:06 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
"FREEDOM OF SPEECH" doesn't mean that you can yell FIRE in a crowded theatre, nor LIE about people. The later is called LIBEL and public figures are not now covered by the libel law.

If the shoe was on the other foot...you'd be cheering and calling it "brilliant".

42 posted on 02/27/2016 2:11:11 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

We already have those laws on the books now. If Rubio or Cruz had said the same thing that Trump did his fanboys would be screaming about tyranny.


43 posted on 02/27/2016 2:11:19 PM PST by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

Give it a rest. Nobody is buying into your pathetic diatribes here.

You have a bunch of people refusing to accept reality, who will grasp at anything right now. They’ll support you.

You are not converting anyone else.

You’re looking delusions, sick, and pathetic.

It’s over. Accept it.

Donald Trump is our next president.

Nothing is going to stop that. NOTHING!


44 posted on 02/27/2016 2:11:39 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
I agree with Trump and Scalia on this one. The current standard of having to prove "malicious intent" in some jurisdictions is far too high and makes the press almost untouchable, no matter how reckless and irresponsible they become.

No federal libel law currently exists, because libel suits are handled in state courts.

Since 1964, when the Supreme Court ruled on "New York Times vs. Sullivan," public individuals who wish to sue media companies for libel are required to prove that the news organization knowingly published false information with malicious intent.

The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said in 2012 that he "abhors" the ruling, saying it gives news organizations the freedom to "libel public figures at will so long as somebody told you something."

Donald Trump wants to 'open up' libel laws so he can sue press

Freedom of the press has been tilted too much in favor of the press and needs to be pulled back to a more reasonable standard for proving libel.

45 posted on 02/27/2016 2:11:46 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregB

Oh, the TDS people are out en’force this weekend.

The most dangerous people are the ones who’re drowning.


46 posted on 02/27/2016 2:11:49 PM PST by Marie (TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Trump said he wanted to change the libel laws. Current libel law allows public figures to sue if a news organization knowingly spreads a lie about them with the malicious intent to do harm.

Trump has already threated to sue his opponents for using adds that show clips from past Trump speaches so we know that he wants to be able to sue people for making debatable political arguments. Trump also directly threatened the Washington Post that it would be bad for them if he is elected President. He is running for dictator not president.


47 posted on 02/27/2016 2:12:51 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

I think trump’s right. Free press shouldn’t make your immunity from slander any different than anyone else. I have free speech but I can’t engage in malicious slander without consequences. Why should it be different for the media?


48 posted on 02/27/2016 2:12:54 PM PST by xzins (Do You Donate to the Freepathon? It's time to take YOUR turn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

If this is how he’s acting now, what will he be like if he were to win the presidency. I can just see it now, his daily briefings will be about who criticize him and coming up with an attack on those who do. When it comes to being thin skinned, Trump is even worse than obama. He is a bully, like obama.


49 posted on 02/27/2016 2:13:05 PM PST by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Yeah you know make it like every other country in the world. Because all the other countries are so wonderful. it will be yuuge. You know opening the libel laws so that negative or hateful stuff is banned, you know like Canada, England, and the other EU countries.


50 posted on 02/27/2016 2:13:23 PM PST by PA-LU Student (https://www.tedcruz.org/l/ducking-donald/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

The lying media should be made to be held accountable! The 1st Amendment isn’t there to protect lies, it is there to protect ones right to speak the TRUTH!


51 posted on 02/27/2016 2:13:24 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

And here I thought you had caught a photo of Glen Beck floating by...


52 posted on 02/27/2016 2:13:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

I agree that just about everything here right now involving Trump or Cruz is being seen through some strange filters.


53 posted on 02/27/2016 2:14:14 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

No I wouldn’t. If Cruz had proposed this then I would be announcing today that I no longer support him. I care about the Constitution and our freedoms far more than I care about supporting any man or politician.


54 posted on 02/27/2016 2:14:14 PM PST by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

And the only way to force them to uphold standards is by the threat of monetary damage.

I’m also sick of them publishing horrible accusations at average Americans, then publishing a retraction a week later in tiny print at the bottom of page ten.

Retractions should be HEADLINES.


55 posted on 02/27/2016 2:14:15 PM PST by Marie (TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
WaPo Editorial board
56 posted on 02/27/2016 2:14:19 PM PST by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dschapin

Imagine that. A Cruzer who supports media lying.


57 posted on 02/27/2016 2:14:25 PM PST by datura (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

He’s called them biased liars since day one. That doesn’t stop the coverage.


58 posted on 02/27/2016 2:14:52 PM PST by Marie (TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GregB

If Trump wasn’t such an easy target with his mouth then there wouldn’t be an issue, eh?

Don’t worry, though, if he wins we won’t be able to post anything negative and Free Republic will be the first site to be shut down. Might as well move to Canada.


59 posted on 02/27/2016 2:15:01 PM PST by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Legitimate, fair criticism is welcome.

Blatant lies are not.


60 posted on 02/27/2016 2:15:34 PM PST by Marie (TRUMP TRUTH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson