We were offered a position there in 2003. I said no. It’s not. England any more, it’s a Muslim country. At that time it was growing but just getting started.
I knew it then and I was a housewife living in flyover country. They’re just tuning in to this?
Allowing an invasion of your country is Treason.
In Britain, that actually still means something.
We’ll see if the inbred Royals actually make an issue of it.
And if they don’t, they won’t be Royals for very long, will they?
That word; benefit. It doesn't mean what these multi-culti cheerleaders think it means.
Ask Sweden.
Admitting millions of migrants will always place strains on a people. Admitting millions of migrants who’ve been trained from birth to hate you and Infiltrate you invade you and subjugate you and conquer you and rule over you and murder you if you won’t cooperate with your own destruction as a free people — this is pure, raw treason by your leaders. They’ve sold you out to the islamonazi invasion ( just like what the ruling elites in Germany and France and USA and Italy are doing to their peoples). Kiss your asses goodbye, UK. It’s over. You’re finished. (And so are we)
A very practical and effective, albeit totally evil, strategy.
So Freepers - considering this constant social-engineering by the Left, what policy, which could similarly be implemented by a Conservative leader, would destroy the nanny-state and "rub the LEFT'S nose it, and render their arguments out of date."
Any ideas?
This Labour ‘strategy’ during the Blair/Brown regimes has been known - and openly admitted - for years.
While President Bush was saying Islam is a religion of peace, Blair was saying Muslim's have grievances.
Neither Infidel leader would face up to he fact we were in a religiously driven war.(and still are.) - Tom
hell, our president isn’t eve3n silent about desiring ot flood our country with muslims- infact he’s down right braggadocios about it!
I guess Mr. Blair didn’t think that transforming and destroying British society was not a topic rising to the level of needing public debate.
Kind of like the way Rubio and others got Rush and Fox to ‘keep quiet’ on the Gang-of-Eight bill as it headed towards the House for final approval.