Posted on 03/22/2016 2:09:24 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Nice article, but isn’t the National Review decidedly against Donald Trump?
I have my own reservations about Trump, but I’ve still been willing to support him as a political leader. If “conservative” leaders don’t support him, they should be saying they don’t like things about HIM, but support different things he says and would welcome other leaders making the same points and standing behind them in the public debate.
So how does the National Review expect Republicans to successfully oppose Garland without there being a general willingness to debate the issues of his nomination and then stand behind one’s arguments, rather than walking their words back and capitulating?
When I clicked on the hyperlink I thought I was going to read an article about Judy Garland.
It’s as bad as Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Yeah, since when did Loretta Lynn ...
Whew! I’m glad I’m not the only one! LOL
There is safety in numbers but we must travel single file like the sand people to hide our true strength.
I swear I read the title, as “Judy Garland and the Left’s Disdain for Truth.” I thought this was some sort of “I guess were not in Kansas anymore” kind of moment.
I agree. A person with a first-class mind can understand that leftist policies have very bad outcomes. If he thinks that’s acceptable, then he’s not a decent person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.