Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice: How Can Gov’t Function If It Can’t Make People Do Things They Believe Will Damn Their
cns news ^ | 3/24/16 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 03/24/2016 2:09:47 PM PDT by Nachum

In oral arguments in the Supreme Court yesterday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked an attorney representing East Texas Baptist University, Southern Nazarene University, Geneva College and the Little Sisters of the Poor whether the United States government would ever be able to function if it could not demand that people do things that those people believe will cause their souls to “be damned in some way.”

“Because every believer that’s ever come before us, including the people in the military, are saying that my soul will be damned in some way,” said Sotomayor. “I’m not naysaying that that is a very substantial perceived personal burden by them. But if that’s always going to be substantial, how will we ever have a government that functions? How will we ever have anything that the government can demand people do in objecting…that won’t be a problem?”

The case—Zubik v. Burwell—is looking at the question of whether the Obama administration can force Catholic and Protestant non-profit institutions to cooperate in a government regulatory scheme that would use the health-care plans of those institutions to deliver coverage for sterilizations, contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs and devices.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abolitionofreligion; abortion; communism; damnedsouls; destroythefamily; jeffrey; justice; littlesisters; obamacare; scotus; sotomayor; zubikvburwell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Nachum

so is Sotomayer advocating draft registration of Amish?


21 posted on 03/24/2016 2:38:48 PM PDT by blueplum (March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So it has come down to that? That question speaks volumes. Let her ponder it a while and let’s see what answer she comes up with.


22 posted on 03/24/2016 2:39:57 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Impeach them all at once. One set of charges, one trial, clean house.


23 posted on 03/24/2016 2:42:15 PM PDT by motor_racer (Who will bell the cat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Freedom of religion requires the state to carefully parse its authority to avoid threatening the moral foundation of the citizens. Her argument is false. Not every, or even most, cases involve moral challenges. When they do it is the responsibility of the government to insure its laws do not subject a preponderance of citizens to infringement upon their religious beliefs.
Her argument is very simple. Religion cannot be allowed to interfere with the authority of the state. That is a direct assault on the Constitution. Impeachment and removal are perfectly appropriate and necessary in Sotomeyer’s case.


24 posted on 03/24/2016 2:43:12 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (Stop Islam and save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Gee. We simply functioned for 225 years with exactly the type of government that she asks about.


25 posted on 03/24/2016 2:43:44 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All
With all due respect to Justice Sotomayer, please consider the following.

It doesn’t surprise me that she got her law school indoctrination at an Ivy League school. Whatever the Ivy League law schools are teaching about the Constitution, it is evidently not the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers as the Founding States had intended for those powers to be understood.

Justice Sotomayer's misguided question as to why the federal government cannot make people do things if they believe that it will damn them to hell completely overlooks that states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for INTRAstate healthcare purposes. This is evidenced by the following excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions decided by previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting justices. I wouldn’t be suprised if Sotomayer and her colleagues have never seen these excerpts.

With respect to the constitutionality of the Obamacare insurance mandate for example, note the fourth entry in the list below from Paul v. Virginia. In that case, state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that regulating insurance is not within the scope of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers (1.8.3), regardless if the parties negotiating the insurance policy are domiciled in different states.

Remember in November !

When patriots elect Trump, Cruz, or whatever conservative they elect, they also need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support the president, but also protect the states from unconstitutional federal government overreach as evidenced by unconstitutional federal healthcare programs, Obama’s and possibly Trump's.

Also, consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices who are clueless about the fed’s constitutionally limited powers.

26 posted on 03/24/2016 2:44:22 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Justice Sotomayor: How Can Gov’t Function If It Can’t Make People Do Things They Believe Will Damn Their Souls?


Better tread lightly Tubby, you soul may be on the line...


27 posted on 03/24/2016 2:45:29 PM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Her argument is very simple. Religion cannot be allowed to interfere with the authority of the state.

That's the implication of her argument, you're right. But she doesn't even claim to make an argument - she denies it, in fact, by affirming a "perceived personal burden." That, in turn, has to be itself implied as referring to religious belief protected by the 1st Amendment. And then underneath it all is her fundamental implication that the government is superior to the people in all cases, and that that position is in fact the very purpose of government itself.

So much for "We the People."

I've read a lot of twisted legal arguments. I can confidently say, however, that her "question" is THE most twisted legal "argument" I've ever read. And because it's from a USSC Justice, it's all the more shocking.

America is in a LOT of trouble.

28 posted on 03/24/2016 2:53:12 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Even fairly sophisticated commentators seem not to realize the damaging legal theory that is taught and practiced as a monopoly in law schools and the legal system.


29 posted on 03/24/2016 2:56:06 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

"Because every believer that's ever come before us, including the people in the military, are saying that my soul will be damned in some way," said Sotomayor.

Liar.


30 posted on 03/24/2016 2:57:04 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsberg have no business as Justices.

Sotomayor shouldn’t even be a judge.


31 posted on 03/24/2016 2:57:08 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The “Wise Latina” needs to be swinging at the end of a rope right beside her partner in crime, the hag Ginsberg.


32 posted on 03/24/2016 2:59:37 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“Because every believer that’s ever come before us, including the people in the military, are saying that my soul will be damned in some way,” said Sotomayor. “I’m not naysaying that that is a very substantial perceived personal burden by them. But if that’s always going to be substantial, how will we ever have a government that functions? How will we ever have anything that the government can demand people do in objecting…that won’t be a problem?”

She went on: ".... There may come a time when we need to demand everyone renounce Christ, pledge to serve Satan, and wear the Mark of the Beast. If we don't force people to act against their beliefs NOW, how will we be able to when it really counts?"

33 posted on 03/24/2016 3:03:19 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is rabies. Anyone infected needs to be put down like a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Her bad logic will trip her up badly.

Counter arguments can include “Should the government be permitted to reject the idea of “conscientious objection” to war, and force people like Quakers, Orthodox Jews, and Seventh Day Adventists to carry weapons and brutally murder the enemies of our government in wartime?”

And really hit home with the argument, that “Should the government, in an effort to close the border with Mexico, be able to order CBP agents to fire machine guns at illegal border crossers, despite the religious beliefs of these agents that to do so would be damnable murder? Certainly that would interfere with the function of government.”


34 posted on 03/24/2016 3:05:35 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Even fairly sophisticated commentators seem not to realize the damaging legal theory that is taught and practiced as a monopoly in law schools and the legal system.

Its all corporate law, every shred of it. And the thing people miss about corporations is that the government owns them absolutely - even private ones. They pay to be allowed to be created, they pay to stay alive, they are completely subservient to government power, and the government says when they die.

Now take all that and "incorporate" human beings. That's what "the law" is today. And from that position, Sotomayor can convert the religion of human beings into the "perceived personal burden" of incorporated human properties owned by the government, and literally like a slave owner (NOT a metaphor), ask why she should allow it.

That's what's actually being discussed here, and all the Justices know it, and all the lawyers know it.

The only people who DON'T know it are those 300 million the government considers it's incorporated property.

35 posted on 03/24/2016 3:08:36 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I am woefully concerned that America is now doomed. I trust the American people miraculously WAKE UP this election cycle and perform a 180 right away. Yep, a good ‘ol revival on a National level.

My precious Lord God Almighty, please forgive us our sins and heal our land. Strike down these progressive socialist in their tracks before they insult You and Your people any further. They mock You, Your Word and Your people daily and are attempting to take us all to hell in a hand basket with them. I have tried to get through to a few of them on a personal level, You know who I’m talking about - without much success so in my hour of weakness and despair, I turn solely to You. As I believe only You can heal their seared hearts and twisted minds now. In Jesus Name I pray, Amen
Oh, and please Lord, give me the physical and mental strength to see Your Work in real time before my time in this world is over. My family & I give You thanks and praise in advance !


36 posted on 03/24/2016 4:01:10 PM PDT by snooter55 (People may doubt what you say, but they will always believe what you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
How Can Gov’t Function If It Can’t Make People Do Things They Believe Will Damn Their Souls?

Perhaps, Madam Justice, the government should re-think what it demands of its citizens.

37 posted on 03/24/2016 4:24:26 PM PDT by Roccus (Fighting POLITICIANS is the true WOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

Agreed, too stupid to live.


38 posted on 03/24/2016 4:25:00 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Sotomayor knows as much about the Constitution as does Obama — NADA. Neither Obama nor Sotomayor are complying with their oath of office.


39 posted on 03/24/2016 4:30:31 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
She went on: ".... There may come a time when we need to demand everyone renounce Christ, pledge to serve Satan, and wear the Mark of the Beast. If we don't force people to act against their beliefs NOW, how will we be able to when it really counts?"

I was thinking the exact same thing!

40 posted on 03/24/2016 4:34:11 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson