Do you really think it would appear there?
To find out whether he was involved, you would have to see every check written by every one of those groups as well as any other group to which he contributed.
Like looking for the proverbial needle.
I know, my real point was, that campaign expenditures are subject to disclosure and just because we can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there if someone were sufficiently motivated to look.
In all probablility the photo licensing is a minor issue, what is more interesting is why they bothered to run it at all, since it was pretty clear Cruz was going to win the Utah caucus with a big margin. So why do the photo ad just before? If it was intended to work like reactive armor against what they knew would be forthcoming on the sex scandal, that just provides added insight into the Cruz campign.