Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
Assuming that his client would not have wanted these records released, I must wonder what sort of a lawyer would even be playing this game?

There used to be a respect for privacy, which apparently no longer exists in east coast cities.

Are we going to get back to public issues, or just drown in the pursuit of dirt--or suspected dirt--on prominent people?

As a trial lawyer, who respects privacy, and keeps files that could violate that respect, even where his client does not specifically care about same, private--I find this sort of thing utterly repugnant.

48 posted on 03/31/2016 11:50:30 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan

His client’s privacy is not at issue.


53 posted on 03/31/2016 12:06:42 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson