Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

Alameda is not a suburb of SF. Stupid writer obviously doesn’t know the Bay Area


5 posted on 04/03/2016 12:59:41 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nifster

They’re using the “commuting distance” redefinition of the term, most likely.


9 posted on 04/03/2016 1:03:50 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Nifster

A suburb isn’t “associated” with the urban area in its proximity.

Here’s the Merriam-Webster definition for you:

“an outlying part of a city or town; a smaller community adjacent to or within commuting distance of a city”

Alameda is indeed a suburb of SF.


17 posted on 04/03/2016 1:19:53 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson