1 posted on
04/08/2016 5:39:37 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
That presents an existential threat to unions, Foust wrote. … And the problem is ... ?
2 posted on
04/08/2016 5:41:31 PM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: Olog-hai
So this judge is forcing non-union members to be represented by a union and worse yet, they MUST pay that union money to get a service they don’t want??
3 posted on
04/08/2016 5:44:24 PM PDT by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(How can God bless a country that's BUTCHERED 53 million babies?? Almost as many as ALL killed inWWII)
To: Olog-hai
The left’s “fundamental transformation” proceeds apace.
4 posted on
04/08/2016 5:46:06 PM PDT by
Salvey
To: Olog-hai
Dane county judge.
Madison is in Dane County. Not a surprise all the courts in dane county are run by totally liberal socialist judges.
It will be overturned. If it makes it to state scotus it will be declared constitutional. Just reaffirmed our 5-2 conservative hold on the state scotus.
5 posted on
04/08/2016 5:46:50 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Olog-hai
The unions don't have to represent the non union workers. The companies they work for pay their benefits not the unions.
6 posted on
04/08/2016 5:47:17 PM PDT by
vigilante2
(Re-elect nobody)
To: Olog-hai
"Once again, a liberal Dane County judge is trying to legislate from the bench," Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, said in a statement. "No one should be forced to join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment."A Dane County judge.
A real constitutional expert.
I think the problem has been identified.
7 posted on
04/08/2016 5:49:07 PM PDT by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: Olog-hai
How idiotic is that. Walker was dead on target on this issue.
8 posted on
04/08/2016 5:52:08 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Ted is the invisible man. When you consider his qualifications, he fades away. Look through Ted.)
To: Olog-hai
He said the law amounts to the government taking union funds without compensation since under the law unions must represent people who don’t pay dues. Easy solution: remove that requirement so the union doesn't have anything to do with non-union employees.
Most laws have separability clauses so the offending section can be removed without striking down the entire law. Is that the case with this law?
9 posted on
04/08/2016 5:55:16 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
To: Olog-hai
The right-to-work law, Article 14-B of the Taft-Hartley Act is part of federal labor law. This should go right to the federal courts and should be over-turned immediately.
To: Olog-hai
Yawn. This is SOP with the liberals on everything passed by Walker.
So far, the score is 17,634,218 to 0.
12 posted on
04/08/2016 6:05:32 PM PDT by
BraveMan
To: Olog-hai
Dane County, land of liberal judges who rule by their bias and not by the Constitution. Kruschev landed in Madison once and after an hour said, “Get me outta here, there are too many Commies around here.”
To: Olog-hai
But it’s OK for unions to take money from workers who don’t want to be in the union.
16 posted on
04/08/2016 6:39:32 PM PDT by
Hoodat
(Article 4, Section 4)
To: Olog-hai
Walker has been fighting against the liberal Nazis on all fronts. The thanks that he got from the GOP-e was to destroy his efforts to turn the fight in Wisconsin into a nation war against the Left.
To: Olog-hai
So I need permission to get a job from a union boss?
To: Olog-hai
Maybe Gov Walker should have been more focused on this case rather than foolishly supporting Cruz’s candidacy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson